FUSES, Finally!?


     I have been adamant about avoiding special fuses, because of the lack of empirical studies.  Here is my question:  What would be something not too expensive that would be a good start.  I use three dual mono Audire amps (for Woofs, Mids and Tweets, and Subs, each of the six channel having four fuses.  I would not not want to spend thousands, even if I could, just to experiment.  My heat sinks do unplug, along with the outputs, and I could try just one channel or one amp.  Paul of PS mentioned what they use, and that might eventually be a possibility, but what do you guys (and gals?) think I should do, to just to convince this ageing skeptic?  Also, each channel of my amps has one single, dedicated computer chip that regulates the filling of the 4 26,000 mf caps (per channel), which might make any difference less than a design that allows a flood of electrons into the tank, presuming that might matter.  DanV
128x128danvignau

Showing 2 responses by audioman58

Fuses absolutely make a difference ,the stock steel fuses tons of resistance , Copper or Silvers 4 x better conductor .
I use on power cords and fuses Furutech Nano fluid which is nano particles of Silver and Gold and fills in the voids ,or pours in metal.
takes 75-100 hours but a noticeable increase in resolution ,system dependent of course.  after seeing on Stereo times best of 2020
$2200 fuses ,that's just insane IMO , the Synergistic Orange at $160 is steep for a fuse but worth the results. Synergistic will be coming out with a even better fuse ,this year I heard  when  is  anybody’sguess and I would imagine creeping up near the $200 mark.
If money is an issue on ebay in the UK they have some decent ones for around $25 each.