Europeans vs. the U.S.A.


The actual title should be Linn, Goldmund, Naim, Gryphon, Quad, Revox, MBL, Meridian, T&A, Tag/McLaren, Rega and Jadis vs. Krell.

Why is it that so many European companies offer complete high end audio systems (source, amps & speakers) while Krell seems to be the only U.S. manufacturer offering the same? I fully recognize that there's an audiophile bias against single brand systems, but I believe all the companies I've listed do offer true high end oriented products that are fully capable of outstanding music reproduction. I don't see why this anti-single brand bias should translate to such a continental schism.
128x128onhwy61

Showing 1 response by unclejeff

It is perhaps that the American market was so overwhelmed by Japanese products bach in the 1970s that manufacturers survived by building the best of what the best they could do.

I suppose the only exception I can think of is McIntosh. I own the 2102 amp and I love it but I would not spend such money on McIntosh speakers.

I also own the Audio Aero Capitole Mark II CD player and one day i spotted it's matching amp here on Audiogon and I made an offer that I was sure he would refuse and now I own the amp, too. While they do work together, I really do like the McIntosh Amp.

I really don't know about full systems vs. the one company that makes the best amp. There are some givens, such as British make excellant speakers and American tube amps are fantastic. Japanese products are very reliable and very old Dutch, British and American tubes are pure gold.

I am only happy that for some reason all of these products can try to work together unlike so many other gadgets like software, cameras, cars, etc.
More to discover