2. misc-audio
  3. 1122030449

Equalization done right, experiences?

I would like to be teached on your experiences introducing an EQ in your stereo hi-end system.
Please do not reply with "never do it" because I took already the decision to do it.
I am more interested if anybody of you has experience in choosing a digital or an analog equalizer.

I am targeting the following products that seems to receive consistent consensus:
Digital : Weiss EQ1 MKII
Analog: Millennia NSEQ2 or Massenburg or Focusrite 2

Is it true that analog EQ still has the charm of making the manipulation less invasive ?

What can you say about this? Have you tried one of the above EQ'zers ?
Thanks
ad010685

Showing 2 responses by eldartford

eldartford
4,262 posts
 
The Behringer DEQ2496 (two of them actually) have been the greatest and most cost effective addition I have ever made to an audio system. I think that the Spectrum Analyser part is important because it lets you see what your room response problem is, and how to fix it, and the automatic equalization process is a hoot to watch. If you want to use it for tone control, the ability to set up, store, and recall many EQ curves would be good (although I don't need that because I have real tone controls).

End of sales pitch :-)
eldartford
4,262 posts
 
Ad010685...Ok if you want to spend the $. Do those units have a RTA and autoequalization capability? You might want to consider the Behringer just for the RTA. I use one of mine to set up the analog parametric equalizer that I have for my center front channel.

Whatever EQ you buy it will do wonders for your system in terms of room response correction. Have you considered the Rives PARC?
More to discover