Dynavector Karat or Grado Statement Reference 1


I have been using Dynavector's 17D3 MkII on my VPI Classic TT (w/Krell, amp,pre,ref phono-B&W 802N) but have read the Grado is very musical in the midrange without loss in the high or low frequency. I read Harry of VPI swears by the Sonata but I would be willing to spend double possibly for my system. The Dynavector is a $1K acrtridge with great sound and reviews. Would The Grado be an improvement or am I possibly taking step backward?
128x128krell1

Showing 3 responses by krell1

I know the term musical is used loosely but I was interpreting it as more involving to draw you in. I am really very happy with the Dynavector and have been at that level for a few years now. I agree it will do most everything correctly for my system and I have been buying and listening to quite a few albums lately so I was questioning if I might find a jewel in the rough by trying the Grado's. I love deep bass and dynamics with impact galore and that shows in my choice of my Krell/B&W system. I read one review where they thought the Grado Statement 1 $3K outperformed the Dynavector XV-1S and Koetsu Rosewood Signature so I thought why not give the Grado's a try again. I really don't have the extra money but if it will better the Karat then I would for the coming winter months of enjoyment. I realize that I could probably resell it if it was not my cup of tea but thought I should ask here first. Thanks to the previous two posts for the great advice.
Is the Grado known to have the hum issue with VPI's or in general due to lack of isolation? I didn't know the Dynavector's were beter isolated but it is looking like I will just be content and keep using it.
Well I decided to buy a Dynavector XX2 mkII instead. I got a really good deal and could resell it if need be. I have really enjoyed the 17D3 Karat to this point so this should match everything really well. I will see then and probably sell the Karat shortly if that is the case. The hum issue did concern me so thanks for the input.