2. speakers
  3. 1325802766

Dynaudio Focus compared to Vandeersteen 3a Sigs?

I loved the sound of Vandersteens 2ce Sig II and 3a Sig and I have listened to Dynaudio floor standing DMs. I understand that the DMs are not in the same league but I did like their presentation. I.e separation and control through the range. Whats missing is the sound-stage.

I am wondering how does the Focus series stand upto 3a Sigs?.

Or am I barking up the wrong tree?.

I cannot get 2Ce Sig II since it did not pass the WFA factor. I am considering listening to Thiel 3.7s (and consider 3.6 if available) and Devore 9s.

Ofcourse Vandy's Treo is in a sweet spot just that I cannot audition it in the area I live in.

If you have auditioned or have experience with Dynaudio Focus and Vandys let me know.
geek101

Showing 1 response by ablang

ablang
165 posts
 
I've owned the Focus 110 and 140 and Vandersteen's 2CE Sig II and 1Ci. I prefer the Vandersteens by a long shot for two reasons. First, over time I came to realize that both sets of Focus speakers were slightly colored in the midrange, making voices in particular sound a little unnatural. The second reason is that as smooth as the Dynaudio tweeter is it can be a little slow, which I noticed on music with very fast percussion instruments like shakers and maracas. It was almost like the speaker was falling behind the beat. I'm not a speed/detail/attack freak by any means--if anything I go for a more relaxed and "musical" presentation. I never quite got the PRAT thing till I realized the Focus speakers had poor timing.

Haven't heard the new Focus series. They do have an upgraded tweeter, so they might be worth giving a listen.
More to discover