Does DITHER explain Analog vs Digital preference?


I came across a CD Digital track with a synthetic added hiss and pop like a turntable. It was added by the sound engineer for "effect", however, it still sounded remarkably good. The hiss and crackle background noise seemed to make the music stand out even further than usual and gives it a life-like real world feel. This may be analogous to a contrasting frame around artwork that enhances the colors within the painting/photo.

I looked through my collection and I have at least a dozen CD tracks, usually pop music, mixed with intentionaly added wideband background noise. These all sounded good... although the higher background noise can be annoying if you allow yourself to focus on it.

This lead me to thinking about how a significant number of audiophiles prefer Vinyl or Analog sources over Digital: Would the Analog audiophile enjoy these "noisy" CD's more than a conventional CD mix with a very low noise floor?

Following this logic leads to a possible explanation for some peoples strong preference of noisy Analog over the technology of Digital.

Could it all be in the DITHER?

In Digital signal processing a technique called "dithering" is used to improve the accuracy of the signal. The idea is simple....a low level of high frequency noise is added in order to improve the accuracy of the conversion of the primary signal. The high frequency noise, which is outside the audible band, is later filtered out in the processing chain, leaving only the more accurately converted primary signal.

It seems plausible that a small level of background noise might actualy raise the ability of listeners to perceive certain low level details within the music. Without this added noise then some of the low level detail simply falls below a threshold of human perception and goes unnoticed. In an analogy to Digital processing, the human brain might actually extract the low level detail from the noise by performing the final processing step of stripping out the wideband noise; the listener simply "focusses" on the music.
128x128Ag insider logo xs@2xshadorne

Showing 1 response by czarivey

Let's turn it around and make it simpler than a+b = equation:

An analogue listener, as any listener of live music played in ANY venue, is exposed to ambient noise of live and natural performance while digital listener isn't no matter what kinda processing involved.

I like listening to music next to musicians in small venues, I like the way it sounds from orchestra hole or from the stage and I like to have company with musicians playing casual or simply rehearsing. There's no digital format can EVER get any closer than vinyl with any number of bits and/or megabits.

I know that lots of audiophiles don't support going to live venues because they're freaked that someone may sneeze or cough during... Imagine how these dummies would react ta any click'o'popie LMAO!


I prefer listening live. That's why my music collection is 95% analogue and the rest is few CDs and downloads. There's no CD or any digital format that can bring real live music.