Do speaker cables need a burn in period?

Major premise: all clowns are asses. 

Minor premise: there is a surfeit of clowns, here. 

Conclusion: ?

🐈💩🤡💩👀😱

Well our technology is not all that and a bag of chips. We still use fossil fuels and can barely get off this planet in a rocket. Science can't prove what we hear because science has not advanced far enough especially with sound. Take the late Julian Hirsch. Bless his heart he was only trying to take the mystery out of our components. If it measured good . ITS GOOD!!!. Now we know he was wrong because a component can test bad and sound great. So all these so called test instruments can't correctly tell which component will actually sound better than another. Remember the THD wars of the 70s and 80s. Manufacturers got THD levels real low to prove their product sounded better than the competitor. My point is, that relying on test instruments is not so cut and dry. Not black or white. We need more technologically advanced methods for cable testing.

Ok does anyone understand the point of andy2 last post? If so please translate. Thanks. 

It’s not really that science hasn’t progressed enough to be able to explain some of the things audiophiles talk about. Things like cable burn in. It’s just that science doesn’t really care about that stuff. They’ve got “bigger things” on their plate. Gibbs bosons, gravity waves, whatever. AND they’re double parked. There is no time. One reason why science will not entertain audiophile stuff like quantum chips and wire directionality and fixing audio systems by telephone is because science thinks it’s above such considerations. Those guys want to talk about “real science.” They don’t want to get involved with a bunch of whackos. You know, like Einstein.

Djones51, it is simple, really: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=FWBUl7oT9sA

🐈💩🔚