Do speaker cables need a burn in period?

Ha, ha!

Enter a word, e.g. "pie"syl·lo·gism/ˈsiləˌjizəm/noun

1. an instance of a form of reasoning in which a conclusion is drawn (whether validly or not) from two given or assumed propositions (premises), each of which shares a term with the conclusion, and shares a common or middle term not present in the conclusion (e.g., all dogs are animals; all animals have four legs; therefore all dogs have four legs ).
   • deductive reasoning as distinct from induction."logic is rules or syllogism"

Here is why truth and pretty are not mutually inclusive.  Ms. Kate Upton is pretty but not truth since you're not with her.  You probably are with Ms. Plain Jane which is not pretty but it's truth since you're with her.

Simple things lawyers can understand since his goal is to earn money to be with Ms. Kate Upton someday. 

Major premise: all clowns are asses. 

Minor premise: there is a surfeit of clowns, here. 

Conclusion: ?

🐈💩🤡💩👀😱

Well our technology is not all that and a bag of chips. We still use fossil fuels and can barely get off this planet in a rocket. Science can't prove what we hear because science has not advanced far enough especially with sound. Take the late Julian Hirsch. Bless his heart he was only trying to take the mystery out of our components. If it measured good . ITS GOOD!!!. Now we know he was wrong because a component can test bad and sound great. So all these so called test instruments can't correctly tell which component will actually sound better than another. Remember the THD wars of the 70s and 80s. Manufacturers got THD levels real low to prove their product sounded better than the competitor. My point is, that relying on test instruments is not so cut and dry. Not black or white. We need more technologically advanced methods for cable testing.

Ok does anyone understand the point of andy2 last post? If so please translate. Thanks.