Do old Fisher tube amps compare to modern ones?


I have a Fisher 400 tube reciever that is being repaired. I got it for a great price but have never heard it. Can anyone tell me if it compares to modern amplification? What will it sound like? I currently have an NAD amp and am looking to improve in the natural quality of the music, soundstage, vocals, etc. Should I expect to lose a lot of bottom end? I listen to a variety of music but mainly acoustic rock, jazz, folk. Speakers are Spica TC-50. Also will be changing CDP.
Thanks for any insight.
dakajoba

Showing 1 response by artmaltman

I've been using the Fisher 400 off and on since my uncle's brand new one in the mid '60's, and the one I have now was refurbished by The Fisher Doctor.

It has real classic tube sound: lovely, lifelike overall, more so than transistor, but somewhat lacking in detail, treble, and control of bass. It's not a modern audiophile tube sound - far from it - but I think most audiophiles would enjoy it.

I would be reluctant to treat it as my main system in terms of sound quality, but also you could do a LOT worse. Most modern tube integrateds are probably better, for more $$ of course.

The Fisher 400 is beautiful in it's wood cabinet, and rather than sell it I use it in my home office. Lovely sound, within it's limits, and IMO a stunning look.

Art