Differences in tubes.


Can anyone tell me the differences sonically between kt77s and 6550s? I know a lot of is dependent on the circuit the tubes are used in. I'm using a Jolida 302b with 6550s in it and was thinking of trying kt77s for something different.

Thanks in advance for any help!
128x128trianglezerius
Post removed 
I'm not a fan of the 6550. At worst, it's a cold, harsh sounding, clinical tube. At best, it sounds relatively warm, yet flat and uninvolving.

I should say that my experience with the KT77 consists of the JJ and Shuguang varieties, and not the classic, Holy Grail vintage British variety. Along those lines, the KT77 is somewhere between an EL34 and a KT88. I would obviously recommend it over the 6550. The KT77 has a pretty fat mid/upper bass that rivals the KT88, and can be great in some amps/systems, though too boomy in others. Its midrange is more open and clear than a KT88, though it will not compete with the better EL34 variants.

Personally, I find the EL34 best for my tastes, but if I had to award a second prize, it would be the KT77. I see a lot of audiophiles on these threads actually prefer the KT77. To me, it comes down to midrange, and thankfully, I've found a way with my amplifiers to produce the bass of the KT77/KT88 without losing that magical midrange the EL34s I use produce.
I was also wondering how the KT-77 compares with the KT-66 tube? I'm also a fan of the EL-34 tube. Beautiful sounding mid range. I've been considering the Gold Lion tube. Running with Quicksilver amps...Thanks...
Post removed 
If you're still using Triangle loudspeakers, you may want to call Kevin Deal at Upscale Audio in SoCal (see the A'Gon Guild). He's a Triangle dealer and (I think) a Jolida dealer who specializes in tubes/tube amps and may have some useful thoughts for you.

Marty