To my knowledge you are correct. Usually I've preferred the Decca pressings as being more quiet at playback. Many Londons seemed to me to have a harshness, which the Deccas hadn't. Just my 2cents.
11 responses Add your response
Not exactly.London was formed because of the split ownership of UK and US Decca.London was able to release US label material in the UK which could not be labeled Decca.London is a UK corporation (or was).A Decca UK LP doesn't necessarily have a London Records counterpart.Check the Stones early Decca releases vs. London.Decca US was started in the early 30s releasing Country and Western.Later they made Soundtrack and Original Casts a major part of their catalog.Check Wikipedia on both these labels.A short fascinating read did I mention Deram?The unipivot?One of my personal faves Delia Derbyshire?
I have three copies of Beggar's Banquet UK pressings the unboxed Decca is really nice.Though the boxed is quite nice as well.The name Decca on the label with no box around it (hence unboxed) is an earlier pressing.Though the boxed is still solidly in the all analog era.I believe I also have a Decca Let It Bleed though don't think I've ever listened to that particular pressing.