2. amps-preamps
  3. 183062-155632

Debating between Mcintosh SS or tube monos.

I have heard Mcintosh solid state 611 (600 watts) but I have not heard tube monos 2301 (300 watts). Will be using with different speakers overtime.

How much of a difference will I really hear between ss and tubes? Will it be obvious on a really revealing system? Any problem buying a used tube mono that is 4 to 6 years old?

I like the idea of tubes being less harsh and less fatiguing.

Anybody directly compare these two?

jumia

Showing 1 response by elliottbnewcombjr

elliottbnewcombjr
5,103 posts
 

1. inefficient speakers: tube preamp/ss amp. unknown future speakers: tube preamp/ss amp.

2. efficient speakers, tube/tube

I always recommend limiting speaker choices to efficient ones, the primary purpose is to be able to try/use tubes to start or eventually.

There is no way I would want a big powerful hot tube amp.

..........................................

Inefficent speakers: I used McIntosh SS C28 preamp with McIntosh SS MC2250 (250 wpc, tested by McIntosh accurate to 305 wpc).

Then I went back to my very efficient horn speakers, sold the SS set, and back to tube pre/tube amp.

over the years: 3 different tube setups: 30 wpc mono-blocks Fisher 80az; 35wpc receiver Fisher 500C; and now 45wpc Cayin A88T (wanted remote control).

Always Tube Preamp: McIntosh mx110z into whatever.

Don't let tube life be a big concern, they last quite a long time. 

I am like a broken record, repeating: if you get into tubes, get thee an inexpensive tube tester.

More to discover