I'm curious about the Chord Hugo TT2 with and without the Scaler. I've been told it's amazing too.
10 responses Add your response
The M-Scaler gives you more. More detail. More air. Better separation. A little smoother of sound but like ricred1 said, it is not absolutely certain this will make the sound better to your ears. Most customers have been quite happy to add an m-scaler to their Dave. I have yet to have a return.
The general rule is...the better and more refined the DAC, the more an M-scaler does to change the sound. And this goes for non-Chord DACs. It was designed for the "TableTop" series from Chord so it is naturally intended to max out sound quality from a TT2 but arguably does even more for a Dave. Most Dave customers follow up and get an M-Scaler.
We have a 30 day return policy. Your obligation is return shipping to NJ.
Why bother with an m scaler ehen you can do the same thng in roon for less we are importing a fast roon core from belgium thatsounds amazing
Fof 3k you get a state of the art roon corehttps://432evo.be/index.php/432-evo-standard-music-server/
Dave and Troy
Audio intellect Nj
Us importer 442 evo music servers
scott i am curious to know if the m scaler function aids/does not aid throwback r2r or nos r2r dacs...
seems on the surface of it that the m scaler is a high-computing-power upscaler, so fundamentally not compatible with/helpful to dacs designed on non-oversampling philosophy, correct?
or maybe this is one of these cases where the reality is counter-intuitive?
@jjss49 this is an interesting question. On the surface, you are right. The approach with a NOS DAC is the exact opposite of what Chord is trying to do with the M-Scaler. NOS DACs are trying to serve up a digital signal in its purest form while Chord and the M-Scaler are trying to recreate an analog signal as completely as possible driving the need for up-scaling. Theory says you shouldn’t be able to hear a difference yet people do.
In this thread poster ecwl talks a bit about this.
So theoretically, it should have no impact. However, many M-Scaler users report improved sound even in pass through mode compared to USB.
Check out this thread focused on the Denafrips Terminator over at Audiobacon.
Ultimately, I don’t have an R2R DAC lying around that I can test this with. You can be certain it won’t take full advantage of what the M-Scaler is capable of.
I had a DAVE with Blu2 (sold), and then a TT2 with M Scaler, and then a Qutest with M Scaler. I sold them all over time, deciding I wasn’t really a fan of the Chord sound. But the one thing I realised over that time was that the M Scaler made everything sound worse.
The sound produced by the M Scaler is brighter, tonally bleached, lean and artificial. It removes the natural warmth and fullness of recordings and adds an artificial sense of detail. People hear this impressive difference and think it must be an improvement. It’s not.
The M Scaler is no different to upscaling through Roon or other software. Rob Watts adds some proprietary sauce to make it sound a little different to Roon but it is essentially the same thing. There is absolutely no reason why a PC cannot do what the M Scaler does, despite Rob Watts’ claims.
There are no free lunches in audio. Massively upscaling audio files to 768 Mhz does not just turn them into the equivalent of native ultra high resolution files and does not come without cost. That cost is the bright, lean and fatiguing sound that the M Scaler produces.
Rob Watts claims that the DAVE/M Scaler reproduces transients better than any other dac, but this is audibly not the case. The DAVE/M Scaler produces splashy, two-dimensional transients which sound artificial, and can be bettered by many other dacs.
The gullible Chord fanboys on Head-fi have drunk deeply of Chord Kool Aid, but make sure you form your own view before buying one. Definitely don’t fall for the old trap that if it sounds different, or if it appears to produce more detail then it is better, because it is not.