Check out the latest issue of TAS. They have a roundtable discussion on exactly that. It is entertaining to read.
4 responses Add your response
Mine goes something like this (Most valuable first):
1. My Apogee Duetta Signatures: Why, because they simply stomp butt when campared to almost any speaker I give a listen to. Replacement would be very costly with minimal gain at any price.
Everything else: Subject to change at anytime..and does from time to time.
Your 300Bs perhaps would not have worked very well with the 4JRs; so maybe the point is moot. I'd love to hear the Lector CDP-7T.
My system is very nicely balanced at the moment and I find it hard to answer this question.
Possibly I'd consider replacing my Ric Shultz modified Sony XA777ES with the new Meitner combination, though that's a serious financial step.
I have vaguely thought of replacing my Super Eclipses with the Coincident Total Victory, though they may be too much speaker for the apartment. Again, a big outlay to go there.
The Laurel IIx Ultimate Upgrade SETs (one of the last made and built by Ron W.) and the BAT VK-50SE stay, but I should get the BAT upgraded to the 51SE.
The need for a more powerful amp to accompany the 4JRs led to my system overhaul. I was running a Cary 300 SEI with my VR-2s. That was a sweet combination for the money.
I was also using the Sony XA-777ES for SACD, and an Electrocompaniet ECD-1 as my redbook DAC. Let's just say these components were smoked like a Pall Mall in the mouth of John Mellencamp (too Robert Blake-y), by the Lector.
The redbook playback of the Lector is better than the SACD of the Sony XA-777ES. JT's "Hourglass" was the only SACD in my collection of over thirty titles that could even remotely compare.
Good system balancing is greater than superior individual components...