Clearaudio Azimuth Optimizer V Fozgometer


I have been through a few threads regarding the Fozgometer for Azimuth adjustment .Has anyone used the Clearaudio Azimuth Optimizer which cost quite a bit more then the Fozgometer and if so how did it go!!
Stump
128x1281stump

Showing 3 responses by don_c55

They are both a rip-off, is what I concluded from internet audio forum searches.

I use a very small round bubble level on the top of the cartridge to set the azimuth initially, then make very small arm azimuth adjustments and listen for optimal soundstageing and low distortion.

Total cost, $10 for the bubble level from Ebay.

Azimuth is best set by ear.
Dicockrum,

Did you try finer adjustments, after using the Fozgometer, or just believe the meter and go with that setting?

My arm [the original VPI JMW-10] has an azimuth ring with index marks and allows very, very fine adjustments.

The later VPI arms with dropped counter weight are too hard to adjust even with the SoundSmith Counter Intuitive IMO.

Rotating and locking a head shell is too crude for me, and most arms have no azimuth adjustment at all.

If you are satisfied thats fine, but YMMV applies here.

Other people have fine tuned, after using the Fozogometer, for even better results.
Lewm

I do not assume the optimal is with the cartridge parallel to the recored, that is just a starting point.

The bubble level that i use is very small (about 1/3 inch in diameter) and weighs next to nothing.

I aim for the diamond to be perpendicular to the record.

This assumes the cartridge is properly made, which I believe my ZYX Airy 3's are.

I believe small adjustments by ear, after the initial setting (whatever method you use), are an assurance that azimuth is spot on even if the cartridge construction is slightly off.

I may try the Fuzgometer after all, as it is not too much money.

Happy New Year,
Don C.