Cw, The amps from the "real" MLAS company were the models
ML-2,mono, class-A, 25 watts
ML-3 Stereo, Class AB, 200 WPC
ML-9 Stereo, 100 WPC
The ML-2, was the great one, but unless you have four of them bridged together its no way on the Maggies. ML-3, did not approach the sound of ML-2, nor did the ML-9. Late ML-2s are quite a bit better than early 77/78 production. I think, also Early No. 20 models were the closest in quality and sound to the ML-2.
Impedence was a problem when mating the SP-11 th Spectral amps of the same era. (DMA-50 &80) so there may or may not be a problem with MLAS. If I may suggest to you, the ARC amps of that era, D-115 MKII, and M-100, sounded head and shoulders superior to MLAS electronics. The aforementioned ARC amps, with the SP-11 MK-1, were the State of the art in 86. Hope this helps.........Frank
ML-2,mono, class-A, 25 watts
ML-3 Stereo, Class AB, 200 WPC
ML-9 Stereo, 100 WPC
The ML-2, was the great one, but unless you have four of them bridged together its no way on the Maggies. ML-3, did not approach the sound of ML-2, nor did the ML-9. Late ML-2s are quite a bit better than early 77/78 production. I think, also Early No. 20 models were the closest in quality and sound to the ML-2.
Impedence was a problem when mating the SP-11 th Spectral amps of the same era. (DMA-50 &80) so there may or may not be a problem with MLAS. If I may suggest to you, the ARC amps of that era, D-115 MKII, and M-100, sounded head and shoulders superior to MLAS electronics. The aforementioned ARC amps, with the SP-11 MK-1, were the State of the art in 86. Hope this helps.........Frank