CD and/or LP collections. Is it about the music?


The question has been asked many times and in different ways about how much your system cost, or what componants you have but I have another question.
How many CDs, LPs, SACDs, 8-tracks, or cassettes do you own? It's only fair to ask since this is really about the music isn't it?
128x128nrchy

Showing 2 responses by lugnut

Thanks for this thread Nrchy. The posts might help me sort through the questions I've been pondering for years. For myself, I'd be better off measuring my vinyl by the ton. It's a bunch. My system is not made of the stuff most audiophiles own. It's an all Linn Aktiv system and does what I like better than anything else I've ever heard. Lesser quality recordings sound great and that's what most of my favorite music is. Only this week I've drop kicked digital by selling my year old player. After a decade of collecting CD's the total is 47.

jrd's statement about music collectors is what has always confused me. I know a number of folks with huge collections that never listen to anything and it seems those I know with the mega-buck systems don't have much software. Maybe it's a matter of money since it takes a lot of cash to have both. Some, but not all, of the high end owners would never consider playing a lesser recording so I conclude that for them (no insult intended) it's about the music when the sun, moon and stars line up......rarely.

I once made mention in these forums of owning a couple of truely rare pressings and was criticized for such. I didn't intend to come across as a collector/snob since I feel strongly that my collection is quite simply a sampling of our musical heritage and I listen to what I own. It's not in my collection for the sake of collecting.

I also play selections based on musical merit and that rarely has anything to do with sound quality. My audiophile pressings are seldom played because, IMHO, Mobile Fidelity, Nautalus, etc. selected music based on the merits of the signal rather than the music. They certainly show off what a system can do and I enjoy it a lot when the music has merit.

I've gained a lot of respect for 50's jazz recordings in mono but live for stereo 60's jazz pressings. The vinyl is of great quality and the recording sessions were done very well. Country music, of which I'm no huge fan, has been recorded very well and is a joy to the ears.

Last night I listened to Quicksilver Messenger Service "What about me" and was blown away by the content. I followed that with Traffic's "Low Spark Of High Heeled Boys". Talk about poor recordings! Maybe it's nostalgia or something. Having lived through this era and seeing these bands live and remembering their contributions and the impact on my future tastes makes the music timeless.

I know a couple of AudiogoN regulars that have very revealing systems and listen to a lot of the same music I enjoy. Those are the people I admire the most.
Pmkalby,

Yours is a good question. I've been an avid vinyl collector since about 1965. For nearly a couple of decades I listened to music that was one to two years old at the time and ignored much of the older stuff in my library. Then the mid 70's through the 80's hit. Between the demise of vinyl in stores and the lackluster music offerings I rediscovered a lot of my older stuff. That developed a habit which I still have. This is also the period where I picked up the audiophile offerings....the need to buy vinyl was there but IMHO the selection wasn't. Along the way I discovered jazz and began looking for older stuff and continue to do that to this day. Another habit I have is storing my albums face forward so I can easily flip through them. If you want to forget about a great recording store them edge out. Live long enough and you'll have more music than I have unless you decide to have kids. I hope this answers your question.