I have used them ever since as my reference cables. They do indeed take forever to break-in, but once done, they are spectacular.
Canare 4S11
I am taking delivery tomorrow of a 15 foot pair of Canare 4S11 cables which I will incorporate into my secondary system. I do not expect much from them as I only paid $106.00 for the 15 foot pair with locking bananas on both ends from Ram Electronics. I am putting these cables up against my Groneberg Quattro Reference cables that go for $25.00 a foot plus termination. I am hoping for the best but am not expecting too much. We shall see. I will report on what I hear after the 200hr break in as that is what I am being told it takes to break them in.
Showing 11 responses by mofimadness
@stereo5...I'm so glad you put in the time and effort on these! I've been touting this cable for years and years on here, but never had any luck because most people think because they are so inexpensive and/or require a long break-in period, they can't be any good. Over the years, I've become friends with a couple of guys from Canare. Even they don't know why they take so long to break-in, but if you're willing to put the time on them, they are richly rewarding. I run mine in a shot-gun configuration and they are even better. See this thread about how I do it. https://forum.audiogon.com/discussions/need-20-25-foot-spk-cables/post?postid=1846157#1846157 |
My number one nemesis in high-end audio has always been "brightness", so I understand. IMHO, the Canare will be a little more "polite" than the Mogami, but you'll need to try them for sure. Balanced connections are usually cleaner, with less noise. That's the purpose for a true balanced connection, is to keep the noise out, especially on longer runs of cable. Most audio systems use shorter cables lengths, so the difference is subtle, but can be impactful... |