Better Path to 5 Channels - 3 ch + 2 ch or 5 Ch?

Hello all,

I currently have a 2 channel system that I am very pleased with. However, I am thinking of adding 3 more channels to give me 5 for use in home theater and 2 for music.

My question is this... to get to 5 channels, would it be better to add a second 3 channel amp to my existing 2 channel system, or to sell my current 2 channel amp and replace it with one 5 channel amp? I’ve heard the multi-channel HT amps are generally not as good as 2 channel amps.

The system will be dual use - 2 channel for music, 5 channels for HT. I do not want to sacrifice the performance of my current 2 channel system, so am not sure if replacing my current 2 channel amp with a 5 channel amp would be a step backwards where 2 channel listening is concerned.

Current system is:
AMP - Mark Levinson No.29
Pre - Theta Casablanca II
Speaks - Green Mountain Callisto

I was thinking of either adding a 3 channel amp, such as a McCormick DNA-HT1, or selling the ML No.29 and replacing it with something like a McIntosh 7106. I’m just starting to learn about gear, so any other suggestions would be greatly appreciated.

Thanks for any advice or inputs!

91df46d5 64a2 4ee8 937a 2674b1828914srosenberg
The ML 29 you have is a wonderful sounding amp and, IMHO, one of the best of a series of amps ML ever made. You should keep the ML and look for a 3-channel to complete your system. Since you want to preserve the quality of your 2-channel, this would be the best solution. If you're patient, you might see a decent 3-channel come up for sale on audiogon, like an Anthem MCA-3 or something similar, that would complement your ML 29.
Thanks, Ncarv... i appreciate the inputs. i am quite pleased with the 2-ch performance, so am hesitant to mess with that aspect. if it ain't broke, as they say.

i was considering the 5 ch approach for 2 reasons... 1. simpler for the wife (one less thing to turn on and off) and 2. i thought it might give me a good excuse to get more than the 50WPC that my No.29 sends to my mains.

sounds like my early inclination was the right one.

thanks again,