Bel Canto DAC vs. Perpetual Tech P3A?


I've had a couple of Bel Canto owners tell me they've switched the Perpetual Technologies P3A, or P1A&3A combo. Is it better? Is the 3A better than the B.C. on its own, or only as a combo with the 1A? Looking for advice.
kevint

Showing 2 responses by srama

www.hometheaterhifi.com has a review comparing the 2 DACS - WITHOUT the P1-A. You may want to check it out. I use the P3-A and I am simply astounded by it. I think the P3-A and the Bel Canto have very different tonal characteristics (neither is better, just different), so its a matter of taste. I think the phenomenal resolution and punch of the P3-A combined with the features offered with the addition of the P1-A (jitter reduction, SOCS, room correction etc) make it a clear winner. Just my opinion.
In response to Tubegroover's comments, I would like to add the following. I recently sent my P3-A bach to Perp Tech to fix a documented problem with the Crystal chip set. I bring this up because the tonal characteristic (which was amazingly smooth AND musical) right out of the box suddenly turned harsh and fatiguing - this happened immediately after I heard "clipping" sounds from the system. I was told by the Technical Director of PT, Jon Lane (an extremely helpful gentleman) that this was because of the problem with the Crystal unit which had just then been documented. They expect a fix within the first week of November. OK, the reason for this long-winded passage - Tubegroover, your experience MAY be due to this problem. I do agree that the BC is amazingly musical - I just feel, that based on my experience with the P3-A BEFORE it clipped, it sounded amazingly smooth and non-fatiguing - and I have solid state electronics as well as metal-dome tweeters - in other words a pretty forward-sounding system to begin with.