I recall a review published about 3 weeks ago - I don't recall where I saw it, though it most likely was in the Washington Post. You may want to google, or check the post on line. The reviewer did a-b comparisons of Mono vs stereo versions, describing the differences.
Beatles: Mono a Mono
Has anyone compared the four mono CDs issued in 1987 to the same CDs in the new box set?
Ie, it seems that many people prefer the new mono versions to the new stereo versions, but what I am wondering is how much and what kinds of differences there are between the original monos and the new monos.
I've compared the new stereo versions to the originals, and found them a bit bright, but I've also heard that less work was done on the mono versions, and I'm hoping that the tone hasn't changed from the originals.
Ie, it seems that many people prefer the new mono versions to the new stereo versions, but what I am wondering is how much and what kinds of differences there are between the original monos and the new monos.
I've compared the new stereo versions to the originals, and found them a bit bright, but I've also heard that less work was done on the mono versions, and I'm hoping that the tone hasn't changed from the originals.