Balanced versus single ended


From my experience, every situation that had both options, the balanced connection and/or increased gain sounded better, regardless of the bolume knob’s final position. More detail , air, emotional connection etc. The single ended cables used were good, not the bargain or so called high end extreme.

Sometimes using balanced or xlr it involved just the source, but optimally it carried through thd entire chain.

Anyways, my question is: has anyone ever thought that single ended sounded better?given the 2 options. Im only referring to a truly balanced connection.

I ask, because a manufacturer who makes tube amps, recommends single over balanced connection. Is there something else involved in this decision, additional parts or labor complexity? Is the signal path extended?

Thanks in advance

 

recluse

Showing 1 response by cleeds

teo_audio

balanced is good for studios to get rid of hum issues. which was it’s orignal intent ... Beyond that, it is a degeneration in sound quality If one is not using it for long microphone lines, or hum reduction along said long line of very fine signals... then it has no place in home audio and is inferior to single ended. and that’s a fact.

I do not think it is that simple. As is so often the case in audio, a lot depends on implementation. Today's environments - even in the home - are full of RFI from all sorts of devices, and the CMR benefit of truly balanced, differential circuits and cabling can help ensure a cleaner and quieter signal. It certainly isn't a detriment, imo.