B-wire - four cables or jumpers?


I have a pair of speakers for which the crossovers are specifically optimised for bi-wiring/bi-amping (Von Schweikert VR5s). As the singal current reaching the speakers comes from an identiscl source, namely the amp teminals, what is the difference between running a second set of cables from the amp, as opposed to using jumpers between the input terminals on the speakers? It seems to my uneducated electronic mind that the only differnce is in the length of the second set, as the signal is merely taken from the speaker terminals, rather than the amp terminals.

If that is so, then what is the sonic (realtime audible) advantage in spending twice the amount of money to run two sets of cables from the amp?

This really puzzels me!
brianjh

Showing 2 responses by rockvirgo

When you use one set of speaker leads all the current passes thru the same wires. When you split the leads for high and low frequencies, each carries only the current it uses because the high and low frequency drivers have different appetites for current. It is believed that separating the flows preserves the purity of the signal.
Ok, let's add this to the puzzle: electrical devices draw current when processing electrical energy. Assuming an inexhaustible supply and an amplitude of signal to process, the load dictates the energy flow. No load, no flow. This explains why your electric bill doesn't skyrocket when you have the lights off.

More to the point, do we believe that if the crossover channels all the current, that the hypothetically-unused current gets soaked up and converted to heat, or maybe sent to ground and otherwise wasted by the crossover? Sure the crossover is a load in its own right. However, it's is my understanding that although the crossover processes the whole signal, it only allows the energy/current to pass to the device connected to it. The "rest" of the current never gets a chance to exist because there's nothing to draw it.