AZ Silver Ref II vs AZ SIlver Ref I?


Has anyone compared these two cables? Stereophile just did a review of the AZ SIlver Ref II IC. I have had the AZ Silver Ref I, and did not like it (after a lot of listening). Anyway, I just met a guy who claims that he likes the Silver Ref II better than any IC currently made (including the Nordost Valhalla IC). I wish the Stereophile review HAD made some direct comparisons to the Valhalla (which is the reviewers reference cables). Of coarse Stereophile did not make that comparison.

KF
128x128tok20000

Showing 1 response by ejlif

I have both, although one is balanced and one is single ended. I think they both sound good, since I don't use them with the same gear, I can't say for sure that the mk 2 sounds better. I would think that if you hated the Mk1 your not going to love the mk 2. I personally think the review in Stereophile was right on, especially the comment about the extreme value of the Satori speaker cable.

I decided to try out the Audience Au24 cables since they were so highly rated in a Stereophile review a few months back. An early opinion would be that I definately like my Acoustic Zen cables better, they simply pass more information in a more natural way. The Audience cables sound bears a strong resemblance to Nordost cables (I've only tried up to SPM and Quattro Fil) I can't say that the Acoustic Zen cables are perfect, as the reviewer states the Sivler Ref interconnect could tend to sound bright in a bright system, but then again so do Nordost cables.