Autoformers, The Benefits in matching amp to speaker



There has been a great deal of conversation about Autotransformers in this forum. Many think they are similar to the output transformers we use on Tube Amplifiers. They are not for some very important reasons. They are not wound the same way, they have no High Voltage insulation, they are wound with heavy low resistance wire and all the winding is used all the time. In addidtion part of the signal current is direct and part is transformed. 

  • THE WINDING.  When we make a traditional output transformer we have to insulate the primary from the secondary for over 1000 volts. This insulation takes up space and winding space is most dear to the designer as we want as much copper in there as possible. We then have to section the windings and interleave them. An interleave of 5 is good and some think 7 or 9 or even 11 is better but that raises the capacitance of the transformer and is hard on the tubes at high frequencies. An autotransformer has no DC voltage in the windings and thus can be bifilar wound (taking 2 or 3 or more wires at once). This increases the coupling and extends the high frequency response by a factor of 2 or more. My ouput transformers are good to 65 KHz and the Autofomer is good to 140 KHz. 

  • THE CORE: As to the core, an EI core is preferable over a torroid as the torroid will have saturation problems if connected to an amplifier that has a DC offset. An offest as low as 20 mV can swing the core in one direction toward saturation. An EI core has a very small air gap that will allow it to ignore rather large offesets. 

  • IN THE AMPLIFIER: Here's where the difference is between a conventional output transformer and a Autoformer occurrs. This is why Wiggins at Electro Voice created the CIrclotron circuit. In a conventional tube amplifier. for most of the signal, only one half of the output transformer is active. It is very difficult to make the two halves of a push pull transformer identical above 20 KHz where the feedback really cares about phase shift. Even the taps on an Ultralinear transformer can go out of phase at high frequencies. This causes the amplifier to ring on one half of the square wave. Though not widely talked about, we who design amplifiers are very familair with this problem. Wiggins realized that if he put the transformer in a bridge circuit that the primary would act as a whole and this problem would go away. That is the essence of the WIggins Circlotron. Because he wanted to keep the ampifier efficient he did use a high ratio transformer with conventional taps. BTW, we do not put taps on an amplifier to "match" the impedance of the speaker as we know it varies. We put them on there to deliver the proper ratio of voltage and current to make the amplifier happy. You can always use a lower tap and enjoy lower distortion, better damping, lower noise and extended tube life. You also extend the class A region. The only reason to use a higher or matched tap is to get the most power out of the amplifier if you play it loud. In the RM-4 manual I suggest this strongly and have termed it "Light Loading"

Now, what is an Autoformer going to do for you? If you have an OTL amplifier you should know that the power is greatly reduced into low impedance loads. Even worse is that low impedance loads will overheat the tubes at high power levels as most of the power supply voltage is being dropped across the tube not the load. So low impedance loads are hard on the tubes and cause higher distortortion All of these ills can be solved by the use of a proper Autoformer.
  
For OTL amplifiers that have high output impedance and produce their best performance into 16-32 ohms one needs a 6 or 8 to one step down ratio. This will make the speaker and amplifier very happy and still preserve the qualities of the OTL. A 4 to 1 is not enough. This is no problem to make and I have been using mine for many years.

An Autoformer can also be used in reverse if one has a low voltage, high current amplifier like an ML-2 which is 25 watts into 8 ohms but 100 into 2. Again a 4 to one will get you 100 watts and and an 8 to one even more. Remember the impedance ratio is the turns squared. So an even a 9 to 1 impedance is only 3 to 1 turns and 1/3 of the signal is direct through the primary.

I hope this clears up the differences in these two very different types of transformers and we can stop considering them as the same. While some may consider a transformer a band-aid, I consider it a device that makes the problem go away.

Please feel free to ask your questions.
128x128ramtubes

Showing 7 responses by atmasphere

Since we are developing a class D maybe I can chip in.
The filter is there to reduce the amplitude of the switching component; IOW the switching frequency of the amplifier which is present at the output of the amp.

The switching frequency is never completely eliminated; what is still there is called 'the residual'. If the filter is doing its job, the residual will be a pure sine wave between about 1/2Volt to maybe 3 volts or so.

While the capacitance of an ESL will affect the residual, the amplifier will otherwise behave as a voltage source, even if it employs no loop feedback.

Class D amps, like all other amplifiers, have greater distortion into lower impedance loads. So an autoformer can help reduce distortion (while also decreasing output power) and it will attenuate the residual somewhat; a lot depends on the design of the autoformer as to how effective it might be in this regard.
Another person to contact about an active tube crossover would be Tom Tutay 1-850-244-3041  He does not have a web presence.
I have tried a crown vfx-2a, audio control, ace, an old ESS from my super quads, and an Audio Research tubed unit. All of them work but I hear a lot more detail passive.
We used the Marchand Tube crossover, which IMO is one of the best made, but had the same experience as you- more detail using the passive crossover in the loudspeaker.
A friend of mine had powered Acoustats; he got frustrated with them and handed the amps off to me wherein I renovated it and installed a tube input stage. It worked pretty well- the original opamp circuit just didn't seem up to the task. Very nice speaker; the biggest problem was if you wanted more power or the like, you had to replace the whole thing.
"An Autoformer or any transformer cannot fix a difficult load and only affects stability in a poorly designed, on the edge amplifier."
@georgehifi That quote is taken out of context but despite that it still appears to be that you have missed the point. I don't have any beef with this quote- I agree with it. What about an amplifier that is well designed? Does an 'autoformer or any transformer' help it with difficult loads? The answer is 'yes'.
So why did you stop making the Autoformers?
Paul Speltz came out with the ZEROs. I think our device was better in some ways- it was EI core rather than toroid, and it had 1 ohm taps! But the ZERO proved easier to explain and since that wasn't our main business we just went with it.
I am curious in reading you white paper and posts here that while you admit that an ESL can have a 10 to 1 impedance range you feel that it is appropriate to run such a speaker with high impedance drive
Like you, I didn't think it would work. It totally did. The reason is as I mentioned- the impedance curve of an ESL is unlike that of a driver in a box, where impedance peaks represent a resonance. ESLs OTOH don't have that behavior. Their curve is based on a capacitor (despite a matching transformer usually in use). So they don't respond all that well to the voltage rules. As a result, an amplifier that makes constant power rather than constant voltage can do quite well on them.
 While some may consider a transformer a band-aid, I consider it a device that makes the problem go away.


I totally agree with Roger’s summation for autoformers, they are an "answer looking for a problem."

I've examined these two statements for a while and they seem to be at odds. George, I think you missed Roger's point.

Note to people who love the sound of both magnetic-planar loudspeakers and tube amps: the Eminent Technology LFT-8b is a much better candidate for use with tube amps (especially OTL’s) than are Magneplanars. I love and have owned three pair of Maggies (currently one---the legendary Tympani-IVa), but they present a 3-4 ohm load to the power amp, while the LFT-8b an 8 ohm. And, if you bi-amp the LFT-8b (easy to do---it has separate binding posts for the m-p drivers and the dynamic woofer), the Linear Field Transducer itself is a mostly-resistive 11 ohm load---ideal for tubes! The Atma-Sphere M60 is known to be a great amp for the ET LFT-8b, as is the Music Reference RM-200.
The Maggies were also not push-pull drivers until more recently. ET was often quite gracious in the old days and sold individual panels to hobbiests. I have a friend who built up a system using multiple panels so that the overall impedance was 16 ohms. The speaker was not only wide bandwidth and revealing, it was also quite easy to drive full range- 100 watts was plenty!

I consider it a device that makes the problem go away.
When we introduced our Z-Music autoformer back about 1990, we always regarded it as a problem solver. The same is true of the ZEROs, which is a similar product.
Since we make OTLs, the problem to be solved is lower impedance speakers. We are in Magnaplanar's back yard and have a lot of local customers that wanted the the transparency of the Maggies combined with the transparency of OTLs. The autoformer was the answer, as its introduction didn't introduce the same loss of transparency that seems to be part of the conventional transformer route.
Paul Speltz, who makes the ZEROs, has a letter from Steve McCormick, a well-known manufacturer of solid state amps. In the letter, Steve says that his amps can drive 4 ohm loads easily, but he finds that when he uses the ZEROs to interface between the amp and 4 ohm load, it sounds better. Paul was pretty pleased to get that letter :)