Audiophilia and the iPod Generation


Point up front: Before I write this, I want to make it clear this post is about the bridge between 'audiophiles' and the modern youth with their iPods - or, whatever - encased in a story because it is interesting. Otherwise skip to the last two paragraphs.

My Uncle recently passed away. Two years before, he had been permanently put in a rest home. He was an audiophile; before he got sick he had a nice surround system with SACD capability, 5.1 with B&W 600 series and Marantz components. He spent most of his time listening to music or watching movies/TV, as he was relatively infirm even before that.

I consider myself an audiophile, much to the fault of my Uncle and Father. I still have my Uncle's Dual turntable with Shure cartridge. Even still, I have no use for other technology, such as fancy cell phones, Kindles, or iPods/iPads. When I went to Iraq in 2008 however I wanted to listen to music, so I went out and bought an 80GB iPod and a better pair of Shure headphones. I put my favorite recordings on it, and it served me well.

After I returned, and my Uncle was hospitalized, I took many of his favorite CDs and put them on the iPod for him, since he could no longer enjoy his system. He appreciated the 'Shure' brand on the headphones. Recently, the iPod returned to me through the family, since they knew I had given it to him. I charged it up - it still worked - and began listening to the selections I had put on it. A diverse collection from many including Julie London, George Wright, Mancini, Classical Organ, Cher, Enya, Al Green, Dave Gruisin, etc; my Uncle liked just about everything.

In the mean time I had bought a cheap pair of 'earbuds' at my local Blockbuster to watch movies on my computer during a move, when my TV was gone. I changed out the Shure headphones for the cheaper ones just for kicks, and they sounded like absolute 'crap.' Granted, the Shures cost about $120 more than the others. But this amount of difference in sound for the price is hard to come by in 'HiFi' equipment in general.

So, on to the point. These Shure earbuds really sound good. How many of these youngsters today start out with a cheap pair of earbuds? Surely they must have friends, some of which may have a better product. If they take one listen to the better product, they'll have to hear the difference. If that happens, then musn't some of them wonder about what they can get and what kind of better quality is out there? Some won't care about sound, just like in previous generations, but many will.

Perhaps this has been written about before, but it seems to me that with all the 'worry' about the audiophile hobby going bust to the iPod generation, there may not be too much to worry about. I think it would help if there was some bridge between headphones and speakers though - once they get a tast for good headphones, perhaps they'll appreciate the sound of a better docking system. As they get older, why wouldn't they branch out into a full system? The iPod and earbuds may actually be a cheap entry into the hobby for the masses that ultimately hooks them.
jimmy2615

Showing 2 responses by kbarkamian

Thanks for sharing that story with us, Jimmy.

It seems like the younger generation doesn't know good sound, but it's actually not true. I work at a college and have this discussion often - without discussing hifi gear. They know uncompressed sounds better. They know the earbuds sound like crap compared to better headphones. They attend live concerts enough to know what music really sounds like.

The problem is 2 fold IMO - they don't truly know what to buy. Why? No one advertises. Bose must be the best, because no one else challenges that claim.

The second issue is that it's not a priority. If getting better sound was a priority, I'm sure they'd Google headphones and get enough information to figure out what they need. They're not stupid.

The issue isn't money for the most part. Look at their shoes, clothes, watches, video games, etc. They have no problem with dropping $100 for a G-Shock watch or $60 for Halo (XBox game). There are some very good headphones for $60 out there.

If it was a priority,I'm sure they'd get far beter stuff than they're using. I think they've accepted what they have is 'good enough.'

I've got plenty of stuff (non-audio) that's 'good enough.' There's people out there arguing what tools, car wax, shaving razors, etc. are the best and why people use the non-mass market crap rather than th'good stuff.'. We argue audio. No difference really.
Thinking about this thread a bit more, I realized something...

My father and two of my cousins are into photography. They argue cameras, lenses, etc. ad nauseum. It seems like taking pictures is an excuse to use the camera, and that they'oncerned with the picture quality than the event or moment they're trying to capture. That may be a bit harsh, but I don't think it's really that far off.

With our first child on the way, I want a good camera to take pictures to document our daughter's first few years (not the delivery!). My Sony point and shoot does a decent job, but it's really nothing special and the pics aren't what anyone would consider archival quality.

I really don't want to ask the about cameras. Why, you may ask? Because I know they'll take it too far. I don't need to hear about every detail of what makes a good camera. I want something that'll take respectable pics that won't cost an arm and a leg, be heavier than a bowling ball, and have a sniper scope attached to it. I used my father's camera at my wife's baby shower (snuck in for a few pics and to say thanks), and it was a disaster.

Why post this here? I think we can get like this with audio. We can get a bit carried away when people ask us what to buy. My brother in law was asking about what to look for in a stereo, and I think I lost him about 2 minutes into it. I sent him to the right store, and he got a good starter system (I consider it that anyway). So I guess it worked out.