Audiophile speakers VS Studio Monitors.


Hi everyone. I record and mix music at home, and I'm wondering about audiophile speakers. Would you folks say that typically audiophile speakers will represent music more accurately than say Mackie, Dynaudio or ADAM studio monitors, for example?
I want to upgrade my KRK studio monitors, and I'm wondering if studio monitors are nothing more than a cheap imitation of audiophile speakers?
For recording and mixing, do you folks think I will do better with audiophile speakers like B&W Nautilus 805's than I would with some Mackie's?
Thanx,
Allen
hethaerto

Showing 1 response by hethaerto

Thanx for the responses, guys.
What's funny about how I mix is that I use a 31 band EQ to force my monitors to sound like regular speakers. I raise up the bottom end and the top end while leaving the mid-range alone.
I'm thinking that buying ultra-flat monitors would be silly considering that I will most likely boost the top and bottom anyway.
The Yamaha's with the ugly white woofers that were mentioned are called NS-10's. They are famous and infamous. They fetch a nice price on Ebay nowadays. They're popular because they represent the limitations one might find in a $50 speaker from Radio Shack. They break up at the right moment to show when you've got the bottom too high, and they have a hissy shrill top-end which people normally cover with tissue to keep ear fatigue down.
The idea is, if one can get a mix to sound good on NS-10's, then your mix should sound good anywhere.
I can't see a used set of NS-10's being worth $800, but I saw a set just now for that price. Absurd.
I'm also considering the Studio model by Audes.
Allen