Just curious if you're just wanting to play CD’s why don’t you run a transport into your MSB Dac? Or do you not like the sound of the MSB?
Audio Research CD6 vs CD9 original and SE versions
I recently had an ARC CD6 in for a demo. The system is:
Intel NUC --> MSB Analog (USB) --> Krell FBI --> Thiel CS2.7
With the ARC installed it went straight to the Krell.
What I heard was a fabulous top to midbass. Where it did not sound right was in the bass. For lack of a better term the bass sound was "rounded". I tried a few different cables with varying degrees of success however I could not live with the bass.
My question is does anyone have experience with side-by-side listening of the CD6 vs CD9 and or the SE versions? If so what differences did you hear? I listen to mostly classical on this system and having poor bass drum, tympani, and double bass performance won't cut it.
Intel NUC --> MSB Analog (USB) --> Krell FBI --> Thiel CS2.7
With the ARC installed it went straight to the Krell.
What I heard was a fabulous top to midbass. Where it did not sound right was in the bass. For lack of a better term the bass sound was "rounded". I tried a few different cables with varying degrees of success however I could not live with the bass.
My question is does anyone have experience with side-by-side listening of the CD6 vs CD9 and or the SE versions? If so what differences did you hear? I listen to mostly classical on this system and having poor bass drum, tympani, and double bass performance won't cut it.