I though it was horns and SETs?
Audio nirvana ends with planar/electrostats?
Always heard quite a consensus that the pilgrimage for lifelike hi-end speakers ends with electrostatic or magnestat speakers. Is that still the case today with top traditional design speakers like i.e. Avalon/Wilson ??
Has anybody of you tried to leave their beloved quad/Soundlab/Mlogan for a Avalon speakers type?
Avalons, seems not bad to many people, easy load, but possibly quite expensive(amp saving?)
On the contrary it seems that more power is needed for the electrostats/magneplanars but models are generally cheaper (more musical?)
In few other words, for a full musical experience and lifelike reproduction (jazz music) better to go for a ESL 989 or Soundlab speaker type and expend the rest of the budget for the right amplification, or go for a middle class Avalon ?
Has anybody of you critically audition their beloved electrostat/magneplan speaker towards a top notch Avalon ? Outcomes ?
Thanks for taking my request seriously and I know that we are talking helicopter view here, but I should start someway without making a too long and boring thread.
Has anybody of you tried to leave their beloved quad/Soundlab/Mlogan for a Avalon speakers type?
Avalons, seems not bad to many people, easy load, but possibly quite expensive(amp saving?)
On the contrary it seems that more power is needed for the electrostats/magneplanars but models are generally cheaper (more musical?)
In few other words, for a full musical experience and lifelike reproduction (jazz music) better to go for a ESL 989 or Soundlab speaker type and expend the rest of the budget for the right amplification, or go for a middle class Avalon ?
Has anybody of you critically audition their beloved electrostat/magneplan speaker towards a top notch Avalon ? Outcomes ?
Thanks for taking my request seriously and I know that we are talking helicopter view here, but I should start someway without making a too long and boring thread.