31 responses Add your response
I bought the Vinyl Cleaner a few years ago in German - at an amazing price. And since I exported it I did not pay the 19 % VAT. It worked great without any hick ups for about 1400 records. It's the best thing since they invented chocolate - as long as it works! But the way Reiner Glaess puts these things together really is an engineering shame! But when I bought it I did not know that it is all glued together. Taking it apart took me about one hour. Putting it back together another hour. Because it is extremely convenient and very efficient I will keep it and accept the messy design.
I'll say it again - the OP makes me glad I bought a Loricraft PRC-4 over 12 years ago. So far (knock on wood) nary a problem, and it does a great cleaning job.
That said, over the past few years there have been a number of reports on this forum of problems with the Audio Desk vinyl cleaning machine. If I were to go the ultrasonic route, I would choose DIY - - many choices available at a fraction of the cost of Audio Desk.
I’ll say it again - the OP makes me glad I bought a Loricraft PRC-4 over 12 years ago. So far (knock on wood) nary a problem, and it does a great cleaning job ....
I have had my Loricraft since the eighties..........zero problems and cleans extremely well and without the unwanted static charge the others create.........
( and so quiet it can be done while others are sleeping!......on the same street ,in the same house..... in the same room....)
Seriously though , this is one of the obvious drawbacks I saw with the consumer bought ultra sonic types is accessibility and ease for the user to repair if needed. They seem to clean well enough , but durability and the length of in service with zero issues the Loricraft has been my experience owning for decades, personally, would be hard for me to see a change worthwhile to me. If I didn’t own a RCM , I likely still would lean toward the advantages the Loricraft offers my wants and it’s cleaning ability can’t be knocked.
Decibell- I had the same issue with a pump failure on my original ADS Vinyl cleaner which was way out of warranty. When I contacted the importer about it (Ultra Systems), they had me send it to them for evaluation and possible repair. As alternative to repairing it, they offered me $3000- almost what I had paid for it - for my machine as an exchange towards a brand new Vinyl Cleaner PRO which has a long list of engineering improvements including ceramic bearings on the pump and motor AND came with a new 2 year warranty as well. Seems fair, and I was not about to cut into the machine like you did- that took guts!
jwpstayman - Lucky you! That is quite a different story from what I read about others having to pay $800 plus $100 intl. shipping for an out of warranty repair. I bought my machine in Germany 6 years ago for $1600. Today's list price in the US is $4500 plus VAT - that is insane! Too many hands between manufacturer and end-user!
After all it took me just two hours, and $10 for silicone to fix it. After 1400 cleaned records my investment is .07 cents and 5 seconds per cleaned record. And you don't see a thing from the outside since the bottom plate covers the silicone seam. It does such an amazing cleaning job while being convenient like a toaster that I will probably keep it until I'm deaf ;-)
@decibell - this is good information and worthwhile for someone who has an out of warranty unit that cannot be traded in for an upgrade. @jwpstayman is fortunate- Robert Stein at Ultra Systems, the distributor here in the States, has generally tried to accommodate customers with problems.
I had one of the earlier AD units, before the new "Pro" model, which is supposed to be better, but I think all of these units (not just the AD) will eventually fail.
I did talk to the distributor of Elma in the States about field replaceable parts and was told that was a non-starter-- I don't know if the ultrasonic transducers can be found on the open market-- i have to believe that unless there is some special tuning that is employed, that would be the other remaining 'part' that fails here. (The AD is obviously more complicated, with not only a drive system to spin the LP and a blower to dry the record, but also those rollers used as part of the wash cycle).
As to Loricraft v ultrasonic, I have a Monks Omni- same principle --and still find that ultrasonic brings something extra to the cleaning process, so I use both.
Thanks for the post, decibell.
From my experience, AD units unfortunately are more prone to issues regardless of model but I also have the KLAudio unit which while a lot less reported issues, do have occasion problems as well. The difference for me at least is KLAudio is much more responsive and field service is actually possible.
Make sure you use the AD unit relatively often, like once a week. Or empty the tank if not in use. If it sits a few weeks with water in it the pump gets unhappy and will eventually break. This is a problem with the first models more than the second Pro version which has an upgraded pump. I made the upgrade myself and I’m very happy with new AD unit but it’s still good practice to keep the water circulating or empty it.
The issue with emptying the AD tank if not in use is the float can get stuck to the bottom and won’t budge. I have had that issue and was only remedied by leaving water in the tank for a period of time.
What makes the pump stop working if it is immersed in water for a prolong period of time? Would be good to understand.
Update. I finally opened up my unit and the water pump is dead not seized. It now appears AD uses several models on water pumps. Mine is black and appears to be China made OEM pumps which are easily replaceable. The bottom like is the water pump is easy to replace once you have gotten into the innards of the unit.
About to perform the surgery as soon as I get mine back (see sad story below). Can I get some pics that shows the "innards" so I don’t go wrong?
Have had the first generation of the AudioDesk cleaner for several years and it’s been a pretty bad experience.
When it worked, it was great but ...
After about a year the capstans rotating the record died. Sent of for repairs in Germany (I’m in Sweden), took about 2 months and cost about 5000 SEK (approx $500).
About 4 months ago the waterpump died, sent it off for repairs again, only to be informed last week (it took freakin 4 months!) that it is "too old to be repaired", but they offered to sell me a new (now the "Pro" model) for half the retail price (approx $1800). Don’t even know if I’ll get my old machine back.
Though it seems to be completely glued together, I thought I’d give it a try to replace the pump myself. Nothing to loose ...
Dealer said that through the years he had about 30% of the first generation AudioDesk cleaners returned for repairs.
Supposedly the current AudioDesk "Pro" model is more reliable, but I think I’m done with the Gläss Audiodesk as a company.
Lookng at Degritter now as a promising alternative.
Glaess recommends Tangit glue from Henkel for the PVC-U housing. PVC cement from Homedepot will probably work as well. Gutter sealant or strong silicone glue to secure the motor to the side wall. After you have cut the bottom open, you need to glue some small support angles to the inside of the housing to support the tank bottom in the right position since it is not resting on a rim anymore. Glue the tank bottom in place and glue the bottom plate to the outside walls so it creates a second seal. If anybody needs pictures feel free to email me direct.
So a bit more on The Gläss business principles...
As I said earlier my (non-Pro) machine was sent for repairs and deemed un-repairable by Gläss. I was offered to buy a new Pro model for half the price of a new one. Currently in Sweden the (list) price for a new model is 34,725 SEK (approx 3,625 US$), so I get a new Pro one for approx 1,811 US$.
But the kicker is, according to the dealer, it’s either buy the new machine at the "discounted" price and they’ll (Gläss or the rep, in Denmark, not sure) will keep the old "un-repairable" machine.
If I want the old machine back, the deal is off.
So what am I supposed to do? Still cheaper than a new Degritter, but extortion-like business practice.
Your post is a model for why fora like these should exist. Anyone who owns one of these machines should be grateful that someone (you) was ambitious and tenacious enough to tackle such a problem and then "bother" to post about. No snarkiness, pomposity or mean spirited attack...just useful, well intended information.
Thank you for the flowers! Always glad to help!
Glaess possibly designed his cleaner the way he did to protect his idea. Unfortunately the price for this unmaintainability is paid by the owner - once it needs maintenance/repair.
It is unfortunate that he does not handle repair cases to the full satisfaction of his customers. It is an extremely useful machine - when it works. But he makes it difficult to recommend his product ....