ATC


I heard some ATC studio speakers to see what the fuss was about. I was not that impressed by the midrange performance. Is better midrange possible? would magico do it? what speaker produces even better midrange?
kenjit

Showing 4 responses by audiotroy

Kenjit ATC Speakers are universally praised for their natural midrange.

The question would bear how were they setup? What kind of dac or preamp was running with them?

If you are comparing them to Audiophile speakers such as Magico you are not going to like the ATC.

The ATC are very neutral in the midrange and many audiophile speakers will provide a bit more of a forward sound. 

Dave and Troy
Audio Doctor NJ ATC dealers
Actually you can build a cabinet out of very thick mdf and the cabinet will be very innert, companies such as Avalon and Usher make suberb cabinets out of mdf.  In the case of Usher the cabinets walls around 2 inches thick and a pair of BE 20 weigh almost 300 lbs.

Aluminum can make an excellent cabinet, it is monotonic and will ring unless it is damped. 

The sound of a speaker is just that we have heard very life like recreations of the studio from ATC loudspeakers,

The only person who knows exactly what sosmething sound like was the person in the room who heard the original performer.

As Itzak said it is a matter of personal taste and what you like.

We sell Kef, Dali, ATC, Quad, Elac, Paradigm monitors. These range in price for $2,500.00-$8,000.00 they all can sound wonderful and each loudspeaker has it strengths and weaknesses:

The Elac Adante hits hard with a lot of bass, good treble detail a bti more forward then the ATC SCM  11 with way more bass.

The ATC SCM 19 sounds smoother and more refinded then the Elac with a bit less coloration and a huge soundstage

The Kef Reference One has more upper ocative detail then the ATC through a bigger soundstage and have greater bass, with a clean midrange and a bit more detail

The Paradigm Personas have the most 3d image, less bass then the Kefs, have a cleaner midrange, and tend to have the more prescence of all of these loudspeakers.

Which is better? Comes down to taste, most people will prefere the Kef Ref or the Paradigm over the less expensive speakers.

Some people prefer the Kefs other prefere the Persona B

Long story short loudspeakers are a personal choice. There is no better only what you prefer, and the matching electronics will also have a huge part to play.

Dave and Troy
Audio Doctor NJ Elac, Kef, Quad, Paradigm, Dali, ATC dealers

The Legacy Calibres are a different flavor they are warmer and puncher then most of the other monitors. We kind of hold them as a system approach with the Wavlet so they  get compared less to the other passives. 

As per ATC the box is very well damped, and the speakers  sound fantastic.

Dave and Troy
Audio Doctor NJ ATC, Legacy, Kef, Paradigm, Quad and Elac dealers
Kenjit your anti ATC rant is just silly. ATC makes fantastic speakers, are there sound for everyone no, but there are fans of all different loudspeakers here. 

Professionally many top studios, producers, mastering houses and top musicians all use ATC loudspeakers

http://atcloudspeakers.co.uk/client-list-pro/

As per Abby Road they are on ATC list as well, so perhaps Abbey road also uses ATC? 

As per cabinet construction, again Usher, Avalon and others use 2 inch thick MDF in a very well braced cabinet don't think too many people here won't agree that Avalon makes excellent loudspeakers.

The total sound of a loudspeaker is the drivers, cabinet and crossover.

The ATC cabinets are very dense and non resonant. the speakers perform very well and produce a very well balanced sound.

Dave and Troy
Audio Doctor NJ ATC dealers