ATC ACTIVE VS PASSIVE

There could be a revolt among "stand alone" amp designers…imagine over half a dozen angry amp techs marching on Washington. 

Kind of like "amp designer's live's matter"....hmmm

I am a Pass Labs lifetime customer, but I too was enticed by the active atc story.  the amps are a-b not class a like pass so not as liquid sounding.
I had the 15" actiive three ways (5 years ago or so).  it was impressive in many ways but the integration of the drivers just seemed off a bit.  Maybe the newer ones are better.  I bought mine used and sold them in 6 months for what I paid for them so it was a nice adventure.  I would have to say that looking at the amps ( I took them apart) i wasn't impressed by the build quality.  Just the clutter, soldering wires etc. struck me as a bit dated.  I went back to Pass and passive speakers. Pass is known for really clean designs so maybe I am spoiiled.  But the active thing makes a hell of a lot of sense.  Even Nelson Pass made a big active speaker.......few bought it though...........

@sm2727   

I believe ATC actives are biased Class A to 2/3 power. So they are Class A for the most part.

They are dated - discrete components and easy to repair and only minor tweaks over 30 years. Part of the appeal is that ATC got it right from the beginning. 

Unusual that the driver integration did not work for you - maybe your used speakers needed servicing.

Do they make a lot of heat? Do you leave them on all the time or only turn them on when you want to listen to music? Do they have a long warm-up time?