Asking for Help with Digital Solution


I am reaching out here because I simply do not have the knowledge or experience with this stuff to make an informed decision. I currently play music in my main system through the Antipodes DX server/player using uncompressed FLAC files. Previous to that I used a tricked out Mac mini with LPS and SSD playing from iTunes through the Pure Music player.  I still own the mini and, although both sources sound good, the DX is in my main system because it offers a naturalness that the mini doesn’t quite match.

I have been reading a lot about other solutions and lately about the possible benefits of separating the server from the player (or renderer). The latest trend seems to indicate using a server such as an Intel NUC, Mac mini, or even Antipodes own CX, paired with a separate Network Audio Adapter (renderer/player), such as a Sonore microRendu or SOtM’s sMS-200ultra (or in the case of Antipodes, their own EX) can yield the best digital sound yet. Software provider roon offers instructions for using an Intel NUC with roon ROCK (I believe a stripped down Linux) as a server that can both play stored files and stream music.

It would be very attractive to me if I could have a server and USB/SSD storage tied to my network, connected by Ethernet to a renderer/player then connected to my DAC by USB. This would be particularly attractive if I could provide music to other areas of the house by simply adding additional renderers and DACs that are connected by Ethernet to my network. However, I will not go down that road if it sacrifices very good sound quality I currently hear from the Antipodes DX.

So, my question is, can I achieve excellent sound quality if I switch to something like an Intel NUC and a separate storage device both connected to my router/network and then connected by Ethernet to a renderer/player located near my DAC? I can do all of that for a fraction of the price of the Antipodes CX/EX solution. Right now, I am scheduled for the Gen3 upgrade to my DX but I am certainly curious to hear from those of you who are more knowledgeable about this stuff than me.


mitch2

Showing 2 responses by mitch2

I am ok using roon and would have done so already but Squeezelite has sounded good on my DX and requires less processing.
Assuming I go through with the Gen3 upgrade for my DX, it should be better able to process roon and that is an option.
OTOH, if I were to run roon from a small Intel NUC with Linux or roon ROCK, then into a renderer like the SOtM sMS-200ultra, how good could the sound quality be? Can that type of set-up rival a stand-alone server such as the Antipodes or one of the better Aurender models?
@astewart8944 , I plan to have the Gen3 upgrade performed, regardless of whether I try another device and I am ok with the USB-only output of the DX Gen3 since I tried the SPDIF out and determined the USB out actually sounds best with my DAC.  However, I am trying to figure out if there is a type of server I can network so I can play music at several locations in my house, while maintaining similar SQ as I get from the DX.  Do you know if it is possible to use the DX as a server connected to my home network and then to feed a player such as the sMS-200ultra or Sonore ultraRendu that would then output USB to my DAC?

@audioengr , could I use the Mac mini as a server connected to my home network and then connect Ethernet to a Sonore microRendu or ultraRendu located near my DAC, and then connect the Rendu to my DAC via USB?  Also, if I download Roon for ios, am I forced to use AIFF files through iTunes or is there a way I can use FLAC files like I use with my Antipodes?

Thanks all