hi byron:
the issue is what is meant by "improves" and what is considered a "good" system.
i believe that audio is a subjective hobby so what constitutes "improvement" is a matter of personal taste.
if improvement=greater resolution , while maintaining a balanced frequency response, i maintain that recordings which are engineered to have a peak in say the range, 1000 -3000 hz, will sound more fatiguing.
i did raise this question as almarg has indicated but i was a bit vague about what constitutes a poor recording.
i am trying to be more specific by saying recordings having frequency response errors will, in a better system, as i have implied be exposed to a greater extent than in another system with certain colorations.
the issue is what is meant by "improves" and what is considered a "good" system.
i believe that audio is a subjective hobby so what constitutes "improvement" is a matter of personal taste.
if improvement=greater resolution , while maintaining a balanced frequency response, i maintain that recordings which are engineered to have a peak in say the range, 1000 -3000 hz, will sound more fatiguing.
i did raise this question as almarg has indicated but i was a bit vague about what constitutes a poor recording.
i am trying to be more specific by saying recordings having frequency response errors will, in a better system, as i have implied be exposed to a greater extent than in another system with certain colorations.