Are Speaker Cables Longer than 6 FT. Superior?


Hello,
I am puzzled!
I have read from a few sources that speaker cables 8 feet or longer are sonically superior to their counterparts that are 6 ft. long or less.
Granted, a couple of the sources that I read the info from were either cable manufacturers and/or companies that sell cables, or have them made for them, such as from the latest Mapleshade catalog, etc.
I do not understand how this could be possible.
Longer cables would have more dielectric coming into contact with the signal conductor, more opportunity for the signal to come into contact with EMI/RFI, and more conductor to degrade the signal, etc.,etc.
If this is indeed true, how is it scientifically possible?
Has anyone out there had any experience comparing an 8 ft. or longer version of a particular speaker cable to a 6 ft. or shorter version of the same cable?
Which was sonically superior?
In what ways?
These same sources do agree that shorter interconnects are sonically better, but they claim speaker cables should be 8 ft. or longer for best sound
Any comments or answers about this would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks.
Lanny
daltonlanny

Showing 2 responses by albertporter

I agree with Justin_time, short speaker cables and long interconnects.

My interconnects are 36 feet from preamp to amps and no issues other than expense. However, it was MUCH less expensive than long speaker cable would have been.
By the way, if you doubt what these cable manufacturers are telling you about lengths, should you believe everything else they tell you?

For the record, my cable manufacturer DID recommend I go with long interconnect and short speaker cable.

Same suggestion I got from Steve McCormack, Tube Research, Atma-Sphere and other reliable sources.