Hello,
I owned the PH2, which was the balanced version of the PH1, for 8 years. At about year 5, I borrowed a PH3 from my boss who was also a big ARC fan at the time. The PH3 was at first so nice as it brought the presentation more upfront in the room. But 5 or so minutes later, it just got to be too fatiguing. A return to the PH2 and the sound was back at the speakers with a much more natural presentation.
I wanted the PH3 to work as I too was hoping for just a little more midrange bloom from the phono stage but the PH3 was just not the ticket. Just because a product has tubes does not mean you get this quality. I learned this with all the ARC hybrid products and the Sonic Frontiers SFL series line stages years ago.
The PH2 is hands down the most neutral ARC product I owned which included (SP-10, LS5 II & III, DAC3 II, CL60, CL150, VT130) and it has a very silent background. I also felt the PH2 to be more resolving because of its quieter background. This was the sleeper in the ARC product line and unfortunate it never got the praise it deserved vs. so many other ARC products that got all the high ratings, like the PH3, that was not at all in the same league. I suspect your PH1 is right behind the PH2.
The PH1 sells for about $400-500 on the used market and the PH3 for a little more so it sounds like you have about $300-500 to spend for a phono upgrade. That's not much to get what I suspect you are hoping for an improvement.
What I suggest you do is use this money to upgrade the TT. There are many many great TT's w/arm on the used market that sold in excess of $2k new and are around $1k now. For now, the PH1 is not the weak link in your system.
And look into the SilverAudio SilverBreeze phono cable. When I changed to this from an ARC Litz tonearm cable, I could not believe all the detail coming off my records that I had not heard before. From my experience, this has been the second most critical cable link, after the line-stage to amp, in my system.
Good luck.
John
I owned the PH2, which was the balanced version of the PH1, for 8 years. At about year 5, I borrowed a PH3 from my boss who was also a big ARC fan at the time. The PH3 was at first so nice as it brought the presentation more upfront in the room. But 5 or so minutes later, it just got to be too fatiguing. A return to the PH2 and the sound was back at the speakers with a much more natural presentation.
I wanted the PH3 to work as I too was hoping for just a little more midrange bloom from the phono stage but the PH3 was just not the ticket. Just because a product has tubes does not mean you get this quality. I learned this with all the ARC hybrid products and the Sonic Frontiers SFL series line stages years ago.
The PH2 is hands down the most neutral ARC product I owned which included (SP-10, LS5 II & III, DAC3 II, CL60, CL150, VT130) and it has a very silent background. I also felt the PH2 to be more resolving because of its quieter background. This was the sleeper in the ARC product line and unfortunate it never got the praise it deserved vs. so many other ARC products that got all the high ratings, like the PH3, that was not at all in the same league. I suspect your PH1 is right behind the PH2.
The PH1 sells for about $400-500 on the used market and the PH3 for a little more so it sounds like you have about $300-500 to spend for a phono upgrade. That's not much to get what I suspect you are hoping for an improvement.
What I suggest you do is use this money to upgrade the TT. There are many many great TT's w/arm on the used market that sold in excess of $2k new and are around $1k now. For now, the PH1 is not the weak link in your system.
And look into the SilverAudio SilverBreeze phono cable. When I changed to this from an ARC Litz tonearm cable, I could not believe all the detail coming off my records that I had not heard before. From my experience, this has been the second most critical cable link, after the line-stage to amp, in my system.
Good luck.
John