I have owned two 100.2's, and a DNA-1 and a DNA500. I did not find the DNA's to have the feeling of life and realism of the 100.2's. I find most solid state amps to sound relatively boring compared to tubes, and the 100.2's were a notable exception.
ARC 100.2 Vs McCormack DNA-1
I have a stock DNA-1 that I am very pleased with that is paired with an ARC LS3 and Maggie 12QR speakers.
I wonder if anyone here has done a comparison between the DNA-1 and a ARC 100.2 or even a D300?
Again .... I am pleased with the DNA-1 with its power and presented sound stage but I am wondering if I am missing anything ????
I wonder if anyone here has done a comparison between the DNA-1 and a ARC 100.2 or even a D300?
Again .... I am pleased with the DNA-1 with its power and presented sound stage but I am wondering if I am missing anything ????