amplifier's "slam-factor"


I wonder if anyone can explain me why there are differences in the so called "slam-factor" between different amplifiers (with comparable power ratings). It is well known that for example Krell amplifiers have a high slam-factor, while Mark Levinson amplifiers are quite tame in comparison, even the most powerful ones (> 300 watts per channel). Spectral amplifiers are very fast regarding signal amplification and transmission, but I find them not very "powerful" sounding (high slam-factor), assuming speed is one of the factors which determine whether an amplifier has a high slam-factor or not.
dazzdax

Showing 3 responses by stehno

I cannot provide the answer to your question, however, I do not believe that the 'speed' or 'fast' actions of the transistors and/or high biasing automatically imply slam factor. Although these positive attributes would most certainly help to control and produce a well defined bass region even more than usual.

Even you stated that the Spectrals are known as a 'fast' amp yet lack that high slam-factor as you mentioned.

The Krell's and Levinsons are both known for a solid controlled bass, but I have never heard them known for their speed or being a 'fast' amplifier.

Fast has everything to do with reproducing the initial attack of a note and the ensuing decay of the same note which will also lead to more inter-transient silence between the notes giving the impression of perhaps a blacker background when in fact the listener is hearing more silence between the musical notes as the musician(s) intended.

Those amps lacking this speed will have difficulty reproducing the initial attack properly as well as the ensuing decay. And in the process subdue some of the micro- and macro-dynamics of the note. Even to the point where the notes appear to run together.

As one TAS reviewer asked in the course of a somewhat negative product review 'I wish somebody would explain why the tempo of one cdp appears slower than a competitor when in fact the tempo's of both cdp's are identical when compared to a metrinome'?

I may not be able to explain this very well, but to the best of my knowledge, this is exactly why.

-IMO
Sean, thanks for validating my previous statement and for adding some of the detail that I overlooked. It is my understanding that Moncrief really knows his stuff about audio.

Two other questions, Sean:

1. You're probably really kicking yourself for not purchasing that Primare P30, aren't you? heh, heh.

2. Why not enter your system into virtual systems here on AG?