Allaerts MC2 Finish


Has anyone heard this mystical gem?

If you have witnessed a rare appearance of this beauty, pls kindly describe your experience with it. Also if you know what phono stage it was riding on, let me know.

Thanks.
cmk

Showing 4 responses by rauliruegas

Dear Cmk: One of my cartridges is this MC 2 finish gold. This is the most natural sound reproduction cartridge that I hear, it has an exellent tonal balance and the right timbre on the instruments, if you have the right phono stage then you can have a cartridge with an exellent dynamics reproduction and that do an exellent job from top to bottom.
You already have a tonearm that I think it will be a good mate for it ( but you have to ask to Jan Allaerts about it ). I use my MC 2 with and Audiocraft AC 4400 and this is a hard to beat combo.
For the phono stage you can go for the CTC,Pass or Rowland Cadence. I'm using a custom design ( my own ).
BTW, you have a nice cartridge on the Dynavector if you like it then you have to hear the XV-1 that is a truly exellent cartridge too, specially with classic music.
Regards and enjoy the music.
Raul.
Dear Cmk: If you decide to go for the MC2 you have to look a phono stage that not only can handle at natural output levels ( high gain ) with out noise, you have to look for an accurate RIAA equalization: that's it that the RIAA deviation ( 20 hz to 20 khz ) stay between +,- 0.5 db to 1.0 db, at least.
It is not admisible a bigger deviation ( yes, any one can hear minuscles deviations on the RIAA if we have the resolution on our audio system. Normally the RIAA deviations take place at both frecuency extremes where we usually want " more " not " less " ). when you are working with this kind of top high end products and when you want the best music reproduction, but if your standards are lower then you can have any phono stage.
BTW, the FM Acoustics is a good choice too.
Regards and enjoy the music.
Raul.
Dear Cmk: These two cartridges are a little diferent: the XV 1 has a more up front presentation and the MC 2 has a more ressesed one. I can say that the XV 1 is a little more " alive ". Both are top performers in some recordings I prefer the MC 2 and in others the XV 1. If I have to choose: I buy both.
BTW, I do a mistake with the point and cero about the RIAA deviation it has to read like this: 20hz to 20khz +,- 0.05 db to 0.1 db. Yours it's ok, it's really fine. There are not many phono stages that can have this RIAA deviation. I hope that your phono stage works with out ( internal or external ) stepup transformers.
Regards and enjoy the music.
Raul.
Dear Cmk: I own, too, the RSP. This cartridge is a big improvement to the traditional " Koetsu Sound ". Now we have and extended, clear an open sound on the treble and the bass is tighter, better pitch and more detailed. It is a good performer, and better than the Urushi ( the RSP it is in another league when you are comparing to the Urushi ). If you like the Urushi sound, then your best choice will be the RSP. Buy it! .You will love it.
Regards and enjoy the music.
Raul.