I second Campbelr regarding the battery.
Regarding your question: there simply IS no alternative technical - and let alone Aesthetics (!!) to the iPod run under Apple Lossless which is far superior to MP3 regardless its sampling rate! See J. Atkinsons measurements which he did on this format in recent Stereophile issue.
Regarding your question: there simply IS no alternative technical - and let alone Aesthetics (!!) to the iPod run under Apple Lossless which is far superior to MP3 regardless its sampling rate! See J. Atkinsons measurements which he did on this format in recent Stereophile issue.