Active speaker, the future? or another fad?


Active speakers have been around for over thirty years so I guess they really aren't a fad, but they've never caught on.

I am wondering with some of the new computer technology and faster electronics if this might not be the time for someone to do this technology right.

When you think about it, it is a good idea. Rather than having any amp that is not designed to work with any particular speaker/crossover, the amp, crossover(such as it is), and speakers are all designed to function as a unit. The three of them are integrated and contained in one cabinet (generally).

Subtractive networks do more than trim the frequency going to a specific driver. There are many other detrimental results to the sound. If subtractive crossovers can be eliminated and replaced with an amp built to meet the specific need of each driver, it sounds like a win win proposition.

The question is; Am I missing something in my understanding or is the whole 'network' thing encroaching on our audiophile rugged individualism?
128x128nrchy

Showing 1 response by twl

The Dali Megaline is an active system, but doesn't include the amps. It comes with the speakers, and an active crossover. You provide the amps. Albert Porter uses this system currently.

I think that active speaker driving is a very good idea. I think Sean also does it. There are many advantages, because the crossover is not in the high-power realm, but in the line-level realm(where it is more elegantly and easily done).

Also, single-driver speaker systems are "active" speakers, because they don't use any crossover. But they generally don't get into the deepest bass region.

The concept is good, has been around a long time, and can be rewarding if done correctly.