active monitors and balanced processor


has anyone had success building a home theatre setup with balanced ht processor like sunfire, connected to active pro audio monitors like mackie? eliminates need for multi channel power amps. (i plan on using balanced interconnects as commonly used in pro audio.) if so, where there any drawbacks other than the obvious power requirements for the active monitors? (i don't anticipate problems with hum/noise due to common mode rejection w/ the balanced approach.) i have heard the mackie hrs series monitors at my local pro audio store and they sound fantastic. the only other drawback i can anticipate is the fact that they are "nearfield" monitors, altho' mackie recommends usage for ht. appreciate any thoughts, especially from installers. t.i.a.
ericjcabrera

Showing 1 response by flrnlamb

"Audiophiles haven't embraced the concept yet so the manufacturers are providing what the market demands."

Actually, for the most part, most manufacturers are not targeting "audiophiles" - which make up only a small percentage of the market. Passive speakers are less fuss, easier and cheaper to make. The market, in general, just want's descent sound. All those extra expensive active speakers with extra cables and fuss are harder to market, more expensive to make a profit from, etc.
There are some excellent active speakers out there. Most people are never even exposed to them, or are not edjucated on the benefits. Thus, why spend $8k for an NHT 2.0 active speaker setup, when you can buy some B&W's for $350/pr + $500 subwoofer?
Well it all comes down to marketing. Heck, just look at Bose...