Active FETs vs. Step-up phono stage designs


I've noticed quite a few threads on A-gon discussing step-up transformers recently, and it got me thinking of the different applications in the phono stage design. I'm curious of the advantages and disadvantages of designs that employ step-up transformers vs. active designs with FETs, especially in tube preamps. Examples would be the new Manley Chinook vs. the Rogue Audio Ares with its custom Cinemag transformers, or the highly-regarded Andros, which also went the step-up route. I'm thinking of upgrading my solid stage phono preamp in the near future, and would like to hear your opinions (and I know we have a few designers posting regularly) regarding this subject.

actusreus

Showing 2 responses by dgarretson

The discontinued MAT02 is replaced by MAT12.

http://www.analog.com/static/imported-files/data_sheets/MAT12.pdf

Like Lew I use this at input of phono in the bottom of a hybrid cascode. It provides huge gain, low noise, and great sound.
Lew, another hobbiest has used MAT12 interchangeably with MAT02 in this application, so I don't think there is any issue.