Accuphase or Esoteric?


I am getting ready to pull the trigger on a new CD player. I've had an Accuphase DP-78 that sounds wonderful, but has developed some mechanical issues, so I think it's time for a new player. I've been offered a great deal on a new Accuphase DP-600, but also very good deals on an Esoteric K-03 or K-01. The only one of any of these I've heard is the K-03. I have a friend who has one, and we auditioned his against my Accuphase side by side, and found them roughly equal in sound quality, although they were different and we preferred one or the other, depending on what was playing. I'm interested in whether anyone has heard the Esoteric against the Accuphase, and also how much better the K-01 really is. The Absolute Sound review was pretty unequivocal, but I never know what reviewers are thinking, and there is a big price difference. Any advice would be very much appreciated.
skreich

Showing 2 responses by nonoise

I just stumbled across this thread and feel that Audiozen is onto something. Presently, I'm breaking in the Marantz SA-15S2b and am simply taken aback at what I'm hearing. It's still early and it's my first SACD player but it's making me rethink my preconceptions about Marantz and this hobby in general. One need not overspend to get really good sound.

From what I've read and in correspondence with a reviewer who taste I now trust (he steered me to the SA-15S2b) the SA-11S3 is a force to be reckoned with. Could it be that Marantz is becoming an alternative to Accuphase, Esoteric or Luxman?

All the best,
Nonoise
It's like comparing a Rembrandt to a fork lifter.

Nice one. I wouldn't know since I haven't heard either but, nice one.