Accuphase E650 XLR Input issues

If you are delusionally 'clever' or penurious and buy from overseas grey-market electronics sources you must pay the piper!

Hi thanks, the balance selector is only applicable for Power in and he's  using the Preamp balance in, but will definitely try

@paradis

Could be bad contacts on the "BALANCED CONNECTION" selector, switch it a few times to clean the contacts and see if the problem go away.

@paradis Here is simplest method to check if balanced input functions properly:

1) need to make custom “debug” RCA - to XLR cable, where RCA hot pin to pin 2 + 3 at XLR, shorted together. Shield / RCA GND as ussual goes to XLR pin 1.

2) using this cable, connect source to left and after to right Accuphase balanced input, and check output. 

3) faulty balanced input with this “debug” RCA-XLR cable, will sound significantly louder. Ideally balanced input should not produce any sound, good pre/amp will produce signal at -40dB or lower level. 

@aschuh hopefully that the case so it's not too big of an issue, will seek for some tech help

Given the diagnostics performed and assuming that ‘softer’ means lower volume, I assume that either pin 2 or 3 (in any case, not the ground pin) of the left XLR connector in the amp (not the cable) are suffering from a ‘cold’ soldering contact, or more precisely, a hairline fissure (this would explain random ‘recovery’).

Have a technician take a look at the XLR input of the amp.

Good luck

i just want to be clear and say that i have tremendous respect and liking for accuphase gear which i have owned on several occasions in the past

it is wonderful gear, so beautifully built and sound quality to die for

my initial response to the op was specifically on the narrow topic of xlr input implementation in their relatively recent pieces

my experience otherwise with accuphase amps have been wonderful, and they have been utterly reliable and absolutely built to last a lifetime

So there.

Thanks all, will try any other avenue and see 

@tecknik  the issue is the cable work just fine consistently on right and have swapped cables left and right as well 

@jmarshak speakee cables has been swapped left and right at the amp side as well

@lalitk et al

hey folks, i am sorry -- i didn’t mean to cause undue consternation

i bought a used e270 couple years ago and felt the balanced input did not sound as pure as the rca input, to my surprise (i had a couple dacs at the time that had both single ended and balanced outs and i could hear the difference in my system) - i did not personally try the higher up models, and perhaps those are immune from this issue

after that experience i saw the following information on the asr site -- please note that i am not a ’measurements guy’ in the least, particularly with respect to using measurements as a proxy for sound quality of any given component, but it was interesting to see the findings solely in regard to noise level in the preamp section and thru the xlr input of this tested unit

i also spoke to usa importer briefly on this topic and confirmed this was an area that accuphase japan was working on, as traditionally accuphase gear was exclusively single ended in design, with no balanced connections

thereafter, with the announcement of the replacement model e280, accuphase themselves mentioned that one of the notable improvement areas was in the balanced input noise level - see below page 5

https://www.accuphase.com/technical_information/e-280_technical_information.pdf

I realize that you mentioned that all works perfectly with RCA inputs, but perhaps try changing Left vs Right speaker cables on the amp side (only) to make absolutely sure that the issue is not with the speakers or speaker cables.

Also perhaps you can speak to Accuphase support..

Good luck

One thought here is that Accuphase Input / output ( balance) XLR is wired differently then most , try a cable wired at the input side per below from accuphase website.

1, Ground 

2 Inverted (–)

3 Non-inverted (+) 
 

@paradis sounds like this is a real functionality issue, I would start debugging it with balanced input preamp inspection.

@westcoastaudiophile it just means the left channel is considerably softer and once it normalized (sometimes few minutes after playing music), it just wake up with the right volume, sometimes it doesn't wake up at all, if that makes sense based on the explanation, no such issue if RCA being used

@paradis "I'm asking on behalf of a dear friend” 

if your “friend’s" question is targeting to collect Accuphase reliability and performance feedback,  my personal experience w/ Accuphase is 100% positive. 

" sounded noticeably softer than the right” - Can you please help to understand what exactly technical problem is, such as but not limited to distortions, tone/EQ ch difference? 

@lalitk 100% agreed! My experience with Accuphase components is positive, and in my setup all Accuphase components produce ZERO background noise! 

"the accuphase integrateds are known to have poor implementation of xlr input(s) - they have been measured to be rather noisy compared to the standard rca inputs"

@jjss49 : more details, recognized Lab measurement results, etc., will be helpful! 

“the accuphase integrateds are known to have poor implementation of xlr input(s) - they have been measured to be rather noisy compared to the standard rca inputs”
 

@jjss49, 

I beg to differ with your feedback. Is this your personal experience? I never heard or experienced such a thing as poor implementation of XLR inputs…btw, Accuphase amps or Integrated are dead quiet..zero noise or hiss. 

Sort of spending quite some times to go thru the troubleshooting on the phone, hence thought of posting here to see if there's any other opinions

@jjss49 

I wasn’t aware of this , I was considering a hair shirt system on behalf a friend and have been looking at Accuphase integrated models as a possible contender, I shall bear in mind.

the accuphase integrateds are known to have poor implementation of xlr input(s) - they have been measured to be rather noisy compared to the standard rca inputs

but not poor to the point of what is described here - which points to a substantive malfunction