Click title to read one, or click date to read all below it.
08-01-02
Jadem6, i totall agree with your review. i had the 4 th ... Genesis168
08-02-02
I have the cantata's the smaller brother to the 4a. i h ... Khaki8
08-02-02
Khaki8, thank-you for bringing this topic to my review. ... Jadem6
08-02-02
I just got off the phone with john dunlavy. of course b ... Jadem6
08-02-02
All this stuff about dunlavy saying the parts are great ... Khaki8
08-02-02
Khaki8, maybe it would be helpful to have you describe ... Jadem6
08-04-02
The sound was so dramatically better. the first thing w ... Khaki8
08-16-02
Just wanted to add a comment re: the mod i did for mr. ... blackie@
08-16-02
Thank-you blackie, it helps to hear your thoughts. can ... Jadem6
08-16-02
There are a lot of things the dunlavys do well, but the ... blackie@
09-03-02
Jadem, the mod was done because i really liked the ... Khaki8
09-03-02
Great review, jd. thank you. am i correct that ... Drubin
09-03-02
The sc111-a is the cantata in a different box. Khaki8
09-04-02
The sc-iiia is a great looking speaker. is the sound th ... Jadem6
09-04-02
So it is, thanks. still a lot bigger than my proac 2.5 ... Drubin
10-13-02
Thanks jadem6! that is truly a great review. everyone i ... Bulldogger
11-03-02
The first time i heard the the dunlavy iv it was the be ... Snook2
11-03-02
Tell us what they are, snook! Drubin
11-04-02
Snook2 is right, they do take a big effort to get place ... Jadem6
11-04-02
Interesting & well-documented post j-d (may i add, &quo ... Gregm
11-09-02
Drubin, i now have the piega 10's. i hesitated to menti ... Snook2
11-10-02
I have had the dunlavy sc-iv in my listening room after ... Radman
11-17-03
I found the dunlavy's (powered by the high dollar theta ... Hockey
03-20-04
John dunlavy please come back! i had to purchase inste ... Stevecham
05-14-04
Anybody got any thoughts about the impedence of the dun ... lisavalentin@
04-29-05
I have a pair of dunlavy cantatas that i bought after a ... Jack43
05-11-05
Thenthing about dunlavy's is eventually you notice your ... Dave_b
05-12-05
I owned 4a's for 5+ yrs and couldn't agree more. to wh ... Daytrader
05-13-05
Dave b and daytrader; i’ve heard these same comments be ... Jadem6
05-18-05
Sure, sorry for the delay...busy! everything i've had ... Dave_b
05-19-05
I can't comment on the dunlavy sc-iva's since i've only ... Njp
05-20-05
Hi njp, how do you think the alethas compare to thos ... Atjandra888
05-20-05
Hi tjandra, the alethas are superb speakers - en ... Njp
05-20-05
Neville, i truely feel bad for you. parting with the ... Piezo
05-21-05
Dave b if i read this right you have owned b&w 801n' ... Jadem6
05-23-05
I'm not sure what your problem is daytrader, but i have ... Dave_b
08-09-05
"honky midrange coloration?" i dont know abou ... Cmpromo
08-12-05
I've been testing different geese on the top of my spea ... Jadem6
08-15-05
Try stacking several geese in a d'appageeso array...sma ... Dave_b
08-15-05
Jadem6, when i had mine i found that sleeping on ... Daytrader
08-15-05
Precisely! i've had so many speakers i have no connect ... Dave_b
08-17-05
Glad you guys could see the humor in that. one phrase t ... Cmpromo
08-19-05
All kidding aside, i owned the 5's for 4 years. as mon ... Dave_b
08-19-05
I thank both dave b and daytrader for getting us past w ... Jadem6
08-19-05
...you're all(jadem6,dave_b and cmpromo) invited over m ... Daytrader
08-19-05
I'll bring the bass ale!! Dave_b
08-19-05
I will chime in here, having met jd on several occasion ... Artg
08-20-05
Well, in that case i'll bring the grease paint and my b ... Dave_b
08-22-05
Artg... you're going to have to do better than that ... Daytrader
08-22-05
Anybody hear the new b&w802d's...pretty sweet and tasty ... Dave_b
08-29-05
I seem to remember a test done with a pair of john dunl ... Cmpromo
08-29-05
Like i said before, i loved my dunlavy's for almost 4 y ... Dave_b
08-29-05
If you change the sand cast 10 cent resistors for non i ... Theaudiotweak
08-30-05
I think ive discussed this with you briefly once before ... Cmpromo
08-30-05
Yes we did talk about crossover upgrades by changing pa ... Theaudiotweak
09-05-05
Hi tom, do you have a list of components and values for ... Jadem6
09-06-05
Jd,yes i have a list of component values for my sc4's a ... Theaudiotweak
10-16-05
I have a pair of duntech marquis that dunlavy designed ... ohio43952@
10-16-05
I almost bought a pair of duntech. they are a bit wider ... Jadem6
10-17-05
Is there anyone out there that mods speaker crossovers, ... Rja
06-18-06
Hello everybody, i'am from belgium, in europe. we ... jeanfrancois.vandin@
09-06-06
Agree. i've changed just about every other component a ... Aoliviero
Review: Dunlavy Audio Labs SC-IVa I have not quite completed my latest project of replacing the critical path capacitors, inductors and all of the resistors. I intend to write a full review including the process of establishing what components to use, as well as a hand drawn schematic for others to use if they choose to try this project.
What I can tell you now is I chose all Duelund components in the critical path and MOX resistors in the non-critical circuits. The improvement, although not as great as some have claimed is very worth the time and money. SMOOOOOOTH! Silky smooth is the first reaction. Resolution is increased, in visual terms it is as if I changed my computer screen resolution from a low setting to the highest and went from 256 colors to 1 million. All the same information is there, the presentation is just much higher quality. Some have stated that it is less grainy; I do not think this is the proper use of words in that I would not describe the Dunlavy IVa as grainy to begin with. Resolution in a visual sense is the best I can do.
Look for a full review in the coming months, I assure you it will be highly educational! It was for me.
Jade Jadem6 09-07-06
Review: Dunlavy Audio Labs SC-IVa Jade when I replaced components in my SC4's the resistors of all things made for the greatest apparent differences.. Except coating the inside of the enclosure with Cascade VBloc which seals the wood pores like concrete.Keep at it and let us know stage by stage. Tom Theaudiotweak 09-07-06
Review: Dunlavy Audio Labs SC-IVa I concur with that Tom. The resistors were the only change in my first phase for the bass, and yet the bass was cleaned up and the leading edge of notes were more focused. The great thing about the resistors is you can get Eagle MOX resistors for $1.20 or Mundorf MOX resistors for $3.50. I chose the latter, but either way this may be the cheapest tweak available in this hobby. Jadem6 09-07-06
Review: Dunlavy Audio Labs SC-IVa Just a minor note for those using new capacitors in a signal line: BEFORE isntalling, try charging the caps with a varistor going slowly from v. low voltage up to their rated voltage. Proceed CAREFULLY thereafter in performing installation. Gregm 09-08-06
Review: Dunlavy Audio Labs SC-IVa Oooops -- just saw that Sean mentions this on another thread. Sorry! Gregm 09-08-06
Review: Dunlavy Audio Labs SC-IVa
I've ordered new Cardas binding posts for my IVAs because I broke one. Currently the wires to the speaker posts are not soldered directly to the post but have soldered rings that are held to the posts by the nuts. Is there any benefit to soldering the wires directly to the post and eliminating the rings? Also, I removed the metal spacers that hold the binding post panels because I have speaker cables (Virtual Dynamics Revelation) that aren't flexible enough to fit into the recess. That's how I broke the binding post. Only down side is the posts are no longer flush with the speaker back which could cause problems in transport. Would like to hear your thoughts on the wires soldered dirctly to the binding posts. Thanks Rja 09-08-06
Review: Dunlavy Audio Labs SC-IVa I have thought about that myself and decided not to just because I wanted flexibility. I have both the bass and treble/mid-range wires on the same post so i don't need to jump on the binding post side. I still hope someday to bi-wire again, that being after I win the lottery.
Rja, your post got me thinking that this is one poor reason for not doing this. The nut on the inside of the binding post is almost always loosening and this can only make for a degradation of the sonic quality. I like your idea a lot, and I also would like to hear your thoughts on better quality posts.
The thing with for us Dunlavy owners is the resale prices are such that it makes no sense to change speakers. Besides what we buy? My feeling was putting a few hundred or a thousand into upgrading thew components will keep these speakers relevant for years to come.
BTW,, has anyone upgraded the tweeter, and how would one go about finding the right tweeter with the right measurements to fit the speaker? Jadem6 09-08-06
Review: Dunlavy Audio Labs SC-IVa Update on new binding posts. I purchased the Cardas CCGG long posts, direct gold plate over copper. The rings that are soldered to the ends of the cross-over wires appears to be brass. These rings were bolted to the original binding posts. I am going to get the brass out of the signal path by soldering the cross-over wires directly to the new Cardas binding posts. The brass rings has to degrade the sound. Hopefully the new binding posts and the elimination of the brass in the signal path will improve the sound. Any thoughts on this from other Dunlavy owners? Rja 09-18-06
Review: Dunlavy Audio Labs SC-IVa Tweeter upgrades? Jadem6, not sure how much this answers your question but I spoke with Alan Hulsebus of Orca Design concerning Dynaudio tweeters, such as I have in my Duntech Princess speakers. He believes the D-28 and D-28-2 sound identical. As for the more expensive Esotar, the only difference he hears is about 1 dB gain in efficiency, otherwise, "same frequency response, same waterfall, same impedance, same distortion, same power handling, same soundstage."
Since I don't know which tweeter Dunlavy used in your SC-IVa, this may or may not be of interest. I will say that I've listened to a friend's system with the mid-sized Raven ribbon tweeter and find it to be somewhat more airy and detailed than my speakers. Also, I had the opportunity to listen to some JM Labs with their new beryllium tweeter in my system and, yes, it too may be marginally better. However, given the complexity of driver matching and crossover design that John Dunlavy put into my system and yours, what are our chances of making a change that "improves" our high ends? Pryso 10-28-06
Review: Dunlavy Audio Labs SC-IVa The speaker binding post replacement and elimination of the brass in the signal path have made a noticeable improvement in my IVAs. I would suggest this mod to IVA owners. Cost should be well under $200 with perhaps 2-3 hours of labor. Well worth the effort IMO. Rja 10-29-06
Review: Dunlavy Audio Labs SC-IVa Did you replace all the steel mounting screws that hold the crossover in place? How about those around the tweeter dome and its plate mounting screws securing it to the cabinet with non-ferrous brass? Tom Theaudiotweak 10-30-06
Review: Dunlavy Audio Labs SC-IVa I replaced all the screws holding the speakers with stainless steel screws. Didn't replace the crossover screws. Rja 10-30-06
Review: Dunlavy Audio Labs SC-IVa I did the screw change. Changed all the screws on the drivers and the crossover plate. I did not do anything inside the speakers. Wnet to a hardware store like Tom said and got brass screws.
All said and done. It did make a difference. There was much less grain and the highs were smoother. This is a tweak for C-H-E-A-P. Makes good audible difference. Go for it guys!
Now since the cold bitter Canadian winter is approching, I will see what others think/ suggest for mods to the speaker.
Cheers,
genesis168 Genesis168 11-12-06
Review: Dunlavy Audio Labs SC-IVa The wonders of brass strkes again.Superior sonic material plus its non-ferrous so it does not disturb the flow of those precious electrons bouncing from place to place. Tom Theaudiotweak 11-12-06
|
|