AudiogoN
Search Buy Sell Learn MyPage
 Learn > Reviews > Analog > 1081543772  Start New Thread | Log In
  Review: Stanton 500E MkII Cartridge
Lately, I’ve been on a search for a great budget cartridge. When I say budget, I mean great sound for the price of a few pizzas—and not that gourmet brick oven stuff, either. I’m talkin’ $50 or less (street price, of course, as some cartridges are discounted more than 50% off list price).

It’s not that I’m poor. It’s just that I’ve become acutely aware of the law of diminishing returns as it concerns audio components. Besides, with summer on the way, I’d rather spend my money on vacations, road trips and, well, some of those gourmet brick oven pizzas with basil and Parmagiano Reggiano and extra virgin olive oil drizzled on top.

So…is it possible to get better-than-CD sound with a low-priced cartridge? The Grado Black ($40 list, $35 at most places) proved that it absolutely is. So did my all-too-brief experience with the elegant Ortofon OM10 ($90 retail, but as low as $50 if you do some shopping around). There are others, too: the entry-level Audio-Technica models, Sumikos, Shures…the list goes on. It’s great news that the average Joe can still enjoy his records without looting the kids’ college fund for a Koetsu.

Rest assured: there are some stinkers out there in this price range. The Goldring Elan, for example, lists for $70 and sells for very near that price. I think that’s an absurd asking price for a poor-tracking conical stylus and stiff suspension that result in a tonally correct but veiled, ‘canned’ presentation. (Note that I heard the Elan the way most people do: on the Music Hall MMF-2.1, not on one of my reference ‘tables.)

The Stanton 500 MkII is widely ignored by audiophiles, and I started wondering why. It’s certainly not a prestige cartridge, selling for a paltry $35 at Needle Doctor (list price is $49). My Stanton 880S was, at one time, right up there with the Shure V15. They still sell it today, in an 881-badged version with each cartridge individually calibrated at the factory. Could the apple fall far from the tree?

As it turns out, the apple fell only about a foot and a half from the tree. The 500 MkII is a compliant, easy-to-use cartridge that tracks well, negotiates slight warps with aplomb and does all the technical stuff well (as confirmed by the Hi-Fi News Test Record and my ears). It’s also lively but warm, offering deep bass but also surprisingly detailed treble response. It has a plump midbass, but that seems to be more the doing of my Thorens TD115.

Setup was easy in the TP70 armwand. The Stanton has a square-sided plastic stylus unit, making it easy to line up against the lines on a protractor. I first roughed-in the alignment by positioning the stylus where the armwand’s manual says it should be in relation to the headhell. It was damn close. A few minor side-to-side adjustments, and I had perfect alignment (well, close as I can get without Wally Tools for the Thorens) in less than 30 minutes. For me, that’s record time. I set the tracking force at the recommended maximum of 2g, and using the Hi-Fi News Test Record, worked my way down to 1.8 grams. (Mistracking began at 1.7g, and became downright nasty by 1.6g. If you don’t have a test record, I strongly suggest you err on the safe side and track the Stanton at a full 2g.)

It should be noted that my comparisons of the 500 MkII to other cartridges are based on listening on different turntables over the course of three years. I heard the Grado Black, Grado Green and Audio-Technica 440ML on my Rega P2 and Denon DP-47F, and the Goldring Elan on a Music Hall MMF-2.1. Admittedly, there’s a lot of variance there as far as the platforms and tonearms are concerned. And the spring-suspended TD115 I’m using now definitely has a ‘lushness’ that the non-suspended Rega and Music Hall ‘tables don’t exhibit.

Disclosures aside, I found that the Grado Black and Green are great performers with regard to frequency response and accuracy, but they sounded somewhat lifeless in comparison to the 500 MkII. The Audio-Technica 440ML—my pick for best cartridge below $100 and definitely the best value under $200—is smoother and more detailed than the 500 MkII, and a much better tracker, too. But the 500 MkII, though rougher, is more fun on most recordings. You already know how I feel about the overpriced Goldring Elan, so you can probably imagine how I think it stacks up against the Stanton.

If anything, the Stanton 500 MkII reminds me of the Benz Micro MC20E2. Though the Benz is much more expensive ($175 everywhere I looked), both are a rock and roll cartridges through and through. That doesn’t mean the Stanton is only good with rock music. What I mean is that the 500 MkII brings the party no matter what it’s playing—rock, folk, classical, jazz. It has an energy you won’t often hear on cartridges in this price range.

The CBS Mastersound half-speed pressing of Springsteen’s “Born to Run” (HC7328), for example, always sounded somewhat recessed to me. The Stanton manages to draw out some extra electricity compared with my Rega P2/Denon DL-160 combo. It also manages to draw out some extra detail. Unfortunately, it does so because the music is more densely packed with the Stanton. The Denon DL-160 is more spacious, and some instruments are simply ‘farther away’ with that cartridge. Of course, the Denon is $180.

The Stanton preserves the delicacy of piano keys on “Entremont Plays Chopin: The Favorite Polonaises” (Columbia; MS7328), but again, there’s an energy that really gets those toes tapping. There’s also a reasonable sense of ambience.

I found that, on numerous recordings, the Stanton performed better than could be expected for its price. Its shortcomings are exactly as you’d suspect: some compression during complicated passages, a little tracking error when groove topography gets challenging, a general graininess you won’t find on more expensive cartridges, etc. But the Stanton is involving enough that you’ll listen past these faults. They rarely get in the music’s way.

I don’t want to go into too much additional detail. After all, for $35, you don’t have a lot to lose by trying the Stanton with a moderately priced table. It may not be a great match with certain tables, but a vintage table like my excellent Thorens TD115 brings out the best in it. My guess is that a Dual would also match well with the Stanton, if that’s more your bag. However, if your system is already on the edgy side, you might want to avoid the Stanton entirely and opt an Ortofon OM-series cartridge or an Audio-Technica 440ML instead.

Summing up, the Stanton 500 MkII is a lively, fun cartridge with full-bodied bass and very good treble response. It works well with all genres, providing you don’t favor a laid-back sound. It tracks well, sounds great and mounts easily. As a bonus, the stylus unit slides in and out easily with so little force, you can change it using only your thumb and index finger without disturbing the cartridge geometry. That’s great news for people who hate alignment chores or like to change their stylus often to help protect their records (or switch back and forth from a 78rpm stylus). All in all, highly recommended.

Associated gear
Denon DRA-395 stereo receiver with MM phono section
Rega P2 turntable (with P3 glass platter and None-Felt mat)
Denon DL-160 moving coil cartridge
Thorens TD115 turntable
Stanton 500 MkII cartridge
Pioneer DV-563A universal disc player
Philips CDR-785 CD Recorder
ProAc Tablette 2000 loudspeakers
Radio Shack MegaCable 16-gauge speaker wire (bi-wired)
Various Kimber, Audioquest and MonsterCable interconnects
MonsterPower HTS2500 Power Center
AudioQuest MC cartridge demagnetizer
Record Doctor II record cleaning machine
Sennheiser HD580 Precision headphones
Sony ProAudio MDR-7506 studio monitor headphones
Grado 15’ headphone extension cable

Similar products
Audio-Technica 440ML
Audio-Technica OC7
Benz Micro MC20E2
Denon DL-160
Goldring Elan
Grado Black/Green
Ortofon OM10 Super
Rega Elys
others...

by Ekobesky on 04-09-04 


 Stanton 500MkII on Thorens arm.
  Follow ups
Review: Stanton 500E MkII Cartridge
Your reviews are always interesting and informative. You do a very nice job of including pertinent info, making comparisons and the fact that you include a picture is icing on the cake. Keep up the good work.

As far as the Stanton goes, if it is anything like its' big brothers, it could probably use a little bit of tailoring in terms of the loading characteristics. This tends to smooth them out a bit and lower the noise floor. Since you commented that the major problems with this cartridge were that it sounded somewhat edgy and a little "congested" i.e. lacking separation or "blackness", some tinkering with your phono stage might give you more of what you think this cartridge is missing. Sean
>

Sean 04-10-04



Review: Stanton 500E MkII Cartridge
All I can say is a very good read....everyone enjoys a good review! More people should write reviews...and I mean myself as well! Everytime I should dismiss the thought "who wants to read what I have to say" because honest reviews are informative and great to read. Let's not forget we are all trying to get to the same place....audio nirvana.
Skeyebox 04-10-04



Review: Stanton 500E MkII Cartridge
Stanton rocks!
Psychicanimal 04-13-04



Review: Stanton 500E MkII Cartridge
I couldn't agree more...it compares VERY favorably to my Shure V15, with the Shure only really surpassing it on some lengthy album sides or other very difficult passages. I'd recommend it easily, and, if you're like me and fairly poor and somewhat clumsy, this makes for a great sounding, sturdy everyday cartridge that isn't expensive to replace.
vanmeterannie@yahoo.com 06-25-04



Review: Stanton 500E MkII Cartridge
I have limited experience with the V15 so I'm encouraged to hear the Stanton isn't totally outclassed by it. It's shocking how good the best cheap cartridges are.

About the last place I would have looked for a good budget cartridge was Stanton. Luckily, the 500E MkII is one of only a handful of cartridges that would fit my Thorens armwand without having special metric screws machined (probably costing more than the Thorens was worth). It was a lucky discovery.

I sold the Thorens recently and along with it, the Stanton. But when the Ortofon X1-MC I'm using on my Rega is ready for replacement, I'm thinking about trying another Stanton 500E.

Has anybody heard recent versions of the 681 and 881? Are they worth the higher prices vs. the 500? And how do they compare to carts like the Denon DL-110, AT 440ML and Ortofon X1-MC? Compared to those carts, the Stantons don't seem like a good value but maybe someone knows better...

Ekobesky 06-29-04



Review: Stanton 500E MkII Cartridge
I have a Thorens TD 115 MK II 3 Speed (it plays 78s) Can I use this stylus - Stanton MK II? I've had the Thorens for years and have cared from it with kid gloves, but I believe I finally need a new stylus? Can you help?
gmadison@musicaamore.com 06-12-06



Review: Stanton 500E MkII Cartridge
I'm replying to a few cartridge posts that I just stumbled upon (see my 881 reply where I've mentioned a bit of my background). I'll explain a bit about the 500E Mk II.

I chuckled with appreciation when I read this review. As far as I know, this body is being made today as a disco cartridge. The stylus is not, however. When it came out in the mid-late 80s, it was reviewed by a British critic as a superb, true budget-audiophile pickup. In fact, the reviewer preferred this inexpensive cartridge to a new, high-falutin' exclusively-audiophile line that Stanton brought out at the same time under a new brand name (he was right: the new line was an ill-conceived disaster).

I have a large collection of Stanton/Pickering cartridges and needles. This is one of the most interesting of them. What they did was to take the pedestrian 1960s 500 body and upgrade it with needles that used high-tech, rare-earth magnets in the cantilevers. This transformed the cartridge.

Pickering versions were also made at that time.

I think that people should start bugging Stanton to put this needle and the complete cartridge back into production: it's a winner. If they'll be able to make any money on it, they'd have to charge a bit more for it, and I think that this would be a good deal all around.

Here are some specs:

The 500E Mk II
VTF 1-2g, compliance 14.5, Tip .4 x .7 mil elliptical.

500EE Mk II
VTF .75-1.5g, compliance 16, Tip .3 x .7 elliptical.

500A
VTF 1-2g, compliance 14; .7 mil conical

I recall that there's also a disco version; I usually regard these as record killers, but sometimes they aren't.
Note that this very pleasant "E" model has a rather broad elliptical, quite different than the .2 x .7 size that was the be-all-and-end-all of the professional stereo reviewers.

Richard Steinfeld

Blabzigorp 06-22-06



Review: Stanton 500E MkII Cartridge
I also have a Thorens TD-115 turntable that came with an Ortofon LM-30 cartridge. I recently tried a Shure M-91ED cartridge and could not get it to balance in the Thorens arm (it was out of the limits of the balance weight adjustment). The LM-30 sounds a little thin, especially on the bottom end, compared to my memory of Shure units from the past. I am wondering if this Thorens unit is specifically designed to take the Ortofon cartridge and nothing that is heavier. I suspect the Shure has a little higher output, but I have not checked that. I am using a mid-seventies Sansui amp with a standard cartridge loading input. ESS Heil AMT-1am tower monitor speakers. Any thoughts on this? Thanks. Garry in Portland.
Tradjazzman 09-28-07



Review: Stanton 500E MkII Cartridge
Hi,
the current L720EE is a universal version of this cartridge and can be used with pmount or adapter for std mt.

The Current 400V3 is the same cartridge body,
the D71EE is the same stylus mechanically.
the marriage of the 2 give you the 500EMKII equivelant
KAB continues to offer this pairing.
also, I suspect Stanton felt that the L720EE universal std/pmount version was enough to allow discontinuing the standard mount only version.

Kevin
KAB Electro Acoustics
Oct 5, 2007

Kabusa 10-05-07



  Post your follow up
Subtitle (change if you like)
  


Your response (keep it on topic)
  


Username (email if non-member)
 
 

Password (for members only)
 
 

        

Please note: your submission will be held until moderator approval