AudiogoN
Search Buy Sell Learn MyPage
 Learn > Forums > Disputes > 1052328901   | Log In | Bookmark This
  Disputes
These are transaction related disputes handled by Audiogon's Dispute Resolution Process. If you have a dispute that you would like resolved, please do not try to post directly into the forums. Instead, use our process by clicking here.

The disputes presented in this area will accept input from members while a resolution is pending. All submissions will be moderated under the strictest guidelines. Only those questions that help to clarify, or comments that advise a resolution will be posted.
  Audionut101 vs Phovenier: Submitted feedback is being contested
Problem: Submitted feedback is being contested
05-06-2003: Audionut101 initiated process
05-07-2003: Phovenier submitted response

Audionut101 describes the events as follows:
sold this person a sub around the beginning of March 2003. this person put positive feedback on 3/7/03. Then he says there was a stratch with the sub. The sub I sold him was SEALED and unopened from the factory. A few weeks after the sale, he says he wanted some money from me since the price I sold it to him was too high. Then on 4/28/03 he put negative feedback. I thought I read somewhere that a person can only leave 1 feedback per transaction.

Audionut101 is requesting the following resultion:
remove negative feedback and suspend this user.




Phovenier describes the events as follows:
The sub I purchased was damanged, but I do (and did) acknowledge it looked to be sealed by the factory. It still worked great so I didn't make an issue of it since he told me he got the units on trade from a dealer for some other equipment, and that I bought the last sub available. He also said he was selling the gear due to changing his room design and needed to raising funds to cover a pending plasma purchase again due to the new room design. He apologized for the damage to the sub and offered to follow-up with the dealer and told me he would get back to me. A few weeks later, I emailed him on the progress with the dealer. He took about another week to reply and then apologized for being out of town. During that time I saw a few more adds from the seller, about additional new gear for sale and I then saw an add about having more earthquake subs, so I emailed him on the progress with the dealer and inquired about trading my damaged sub for one of the new ones since he had come into more subs or give me a small refund. He has not returned my emails and ignored me since. That was over a month ago.

My negative feedback was not about how he represented the sub (I believe he thought it was new), but how he handled the situation. If he would have told me he could not do anything, I would accept that, but he offered assistance and then ignored me.

Also, I contacted the manufacturer and was told the unit I have did not exist according to their records. A normal Earthquake sub should have SN on the sub amp, but on this one the SN was in the manual and according to the VP of Sales was not a vaild Earthquake SN. This can be verfied by contacting Earthquake. I'll provide a copy of my SN documentation if requested.

It is also worth noting I posted my experience with the seller in repsonse sales post of a similar sub on AVS Forum and the seller immediatly (within minutes) removed the offer to sell the product stating it was a bad post. Not once did he dispute my position, or contact me to discuss, or even post a reply to present his position, he just eliminated all offers to sell any equipment. I have copies of this post and can provide this data and emails as well if requested.

Phovenier's proposed resolution:
Keep the negative feedback since I do not consider the sub purchase a positive transaction and other users should be aware of how my transaction with the seller went. I purchased two items from this seller and the AMP was fine so I consider that transaction to be positive.




Audionut101's rebuttal:
This is a joke. I told Phovenier that I had two subs for sale. And that he was purchasing one. I was in contact with him for a while, but I never did get his last e-mail and quite frankly since I did not hear from him I kind of forgot about the issue. I told him that I would inquire from the dealer that I got the sub from, which I did and the dealer states that he sold me brand new equipment. Since I didnt open the sub myself, I can not be 100% sure that the sub was not damaged, but more 99% of the time when it is sealed that way it usually is a good sign that the equipmenet is good.

All I would like to say is that from your rules, a person is only allowed to give one feedback per transaction. The original feedback was positive, the second one a month later is negative. The original feedback should stay as per your rules. This person should be suspended.




As of 05-07-2003, Audiogon is requesting input from members regarding this dispute.
Audiogon  (Threads | Answers | This Thread)

05-07-03
  Responses (1-20 of 20)
Click title to read one, or click date to read all below it.

05-07-03   agree with: Phovenier completely, grant full request audio ...   Audio_profiler

05-07-03   agree with: Phovenier completely, grant full request there ...   Viggen

05-07-03   agree with: Both parties have valid points, compromise sel ...   Leftistelf

05-07-03   agree with: Phovenier completely, grant full request   Pmkalby

05-07-03   agree with: Phovenier completely, grant full request imo, ...   Njonker

05-07-03   agree with: Both parties have valid points, compromise if ...   Cpdunn99

05-07-03   agree with: Phovenier completely, grant full request the o ...   Elizabeth

05-08-03   agree with: Audionut101 completely, grant full request aud ...   Justlisten

05-08-03   agree with: Audionut101 completely, grant full request i'd ...   Marchman

05-08-03: Jawjabill
Agree with: Phovenier completely, grant full request

I meant to vote for Phovienier.

"Also, I contacted the manufacturer and was told the unit I have did not exist according to their records. A normal Earthquake sub should have SN on the sub amp, but on this one the SN was in the manual and according to the VP of Sales was not a vaild Earthquake SN. This can be verfied by contacting Earthquake. I'll provide a copy of my SN documentation if requested."

Forget all of the other points here. This is the real issue in my opinion. If a problem developed with the unit and the buyer wanted to send it back for repair on his own nickel, he would be out of luck because mfgs can legally not return gray market goods that have been sent to them for repair. So the buyer could potentially be out of the funds and unit at some point. But, then again gray market stuff never goes bad.

Jawjabill  (Answers | This Thread)


05-08-03   In response to a few questions/comments presented: 1.the su ...   Phovenier

05-09-03   agree with: Phovenier completely, grant full request the m ...   Cuonghuutran

05-09-03   agree with: Audionut101 completely, grant full request thi ...   Viridian

05-09-03   agree with: Phovenier completely, grant full request phove ...   Audioq

05-09-03   agree with: Phovenier completely, grant full request   Scottht

05-10-03   agree with: Phovenier completely, grant full request i ass ...   Soundvideo

05-10-03   agree with: Audionut101 completely, grant full request whi ...   Mitcho

05-11-03   agree with: Phovenier completely, grant full request   Scottht

05-12-03   It appears the vast majority of the membership agrees my neg ...   Phovenier

05-15-03   Thanks everyone for their comments, feedback and input. kud ...   Audionut101


  Closed for Input
Only the two Disputants may post now

This thread is no longer accepting general input.
Only the two disputants may post their follow ups about resolution.
  Post your response
Followup by "Audionut101" or "Phovenier" only


Your Username


Your Password