AudiogoN
Search Buy Sell Learn MyPage
 Learn > Forums > Misc Audio > 1257469878  Start New Thread | Log In | Bookmark This
  How do you judge your system's neutrality?

Here’s an answer I’ve been kicking around: Your system is becoming more neutral whenever you change a system element (component, cable, room treatment, etc.) and you get the following results:

(1) Individual pieces of music sound more unique.
(2) Your music collection sounds more diverse.

This theory occurred to me one day when I changed amps and noticed that the timbres of instruments were suddenly more distinct from one another. With the old amp, all instruments seemed to have a common harmonic element (the signature of the amp?!). With the new amp, individual instrument timbres sounded more unique and the range of instrument timbres sounded more diverse. I went on to notice that whole songs (and even whole albums) sounded more unique, and that my music collection, taken as a whole, sounded more diverse.

That led me to the following idea: If, after changing a system element, (1) individual pieces of music sound more unique, and (2) your music collection sounds more diverse, then your system is contributing less of its own signature to the music. And less signature means more neutral.

Thoughts?

P.S. This is only a way of judging the relative neutrality of a system. Judging the absolute neutrality of a system is a philosophical question for another day.

P.P.S. I don’t believe a system’s signature can be reduced to zero. But it doesn’t follow from that that differences in neutrality do not exist.

P.P.P.S. I’m not suggesting that neutrality is the most important goal in building an audio system, but in my experience, the changes that have resulted in greater neutrality (using the standard above) have also been the changes that resulted in more musical enjoyment.
Bryoncunningham  (System | Reviews | Threads | Answers | This Thread)

11-05-09
  Responses (351-396 of 396)
Click title to read one, or click date to read all below it.

05-12-11   Mrtennis, i have given up that quest, nor will i trust most ...   Tbg

05-12-11   norm, don't tell me you purchased a speaker just because it ...   Albertporter

05-12-11   not a single person on this thread, which is now up to 353 ...   Bryoncunningham

05-12-11   What kind of equipment does this straw man own?   Albertporter

05-12-11   You can record the sound over the air with a two channel pro ...   6550c

05-12-11   Swiss speakers are the most neutral.   Michael02467

05-12-11   Bryoncunningham , you say, "or my post from yesterday.. ...   Tbg

05-13-11   I was not addressing you, tbg. bc   Bryoncunningham

05-13-11   The question is "how to judge neutrality ?" if ne ...   Mrtennis

05-13-11   Hi mike: just a joke but "most neutral" reminds m ...   Mrtennis

05-14-11   since... accuracy is a matter of degree. therefore... in ...   Bryoncunningham

05-14-11   What you hear with neutral versus colored sound is analogous ...   Mapman

05-14-11   Hi byron accuracy is not a matter of degree. something is e ...   Mrtennis

05-14-11: Almarg
Mr. T, any measurement instrument ever devised, for the purpose of measuring anything, has (or at least should have) what is commonly referred to as an "accuracy" specification associated with it, notwithstanding the fact that the specification arguably would be better referred to as an "inaccuracy" specification.

A thermometer, for example, may be "accurate" to within +/- 0.5 degrees. A scale may be "accurate" to within +/- 0.1 pounds. A speedometer may be "accurate" to within +/- 2 mph.
05-14-11: Mrtennis
You may be confusing degrees of inaccuracy with degrees of accuracy which is illogical.
And from the current thread on accuracy:
05-13-11: Mrtennis
You guys are forgetting about a basic fact. accuracy means perfection.

for example one inch is exactly one inch. in audio, all components have flaws. they are imperfect. therefore accuracy cannot exist .

it has nothing to do with listening. its the fact that all components are designed with flaws. you might be able to find components which produce a sound which provides sufficient resolution , a balanced frequency response, and other attributes that appeal to audiophiles. if a stereo system performs that way , where most recordings sound different and there is no noticeable consistent sonic signature, the condition may be "virtual accuracy", but a stereo system can never be accurate (perfect) since the components that make up the stereo sytem are not accurate.
Your comments strike me as drawing a distinction without there being a meaningful difference. Do the facts that nothing is perfect, and nothing is perfectly accurate, negate the value of either striving for ways in which accuracy might be improved, or striving to identify and characterize inaccuracies, and in the process hopefully making possible better informed tradeoffs between accuracy and subjectively pleasing inaccuracies?

And, btw, nothing is perfect, not even in nature. Consider the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle. But fundamental to the design processes that underlie just about any engineering achievement are error analyses that address and take into account myriad contributors to inaccuracy.

IMO the fact that perfect accuracy in an audio component is neither achievable nor even precisely definable is not reason to declare inapplicable to audio the goals of striving to reduce inaccuracy/improve accuracy, and/or striving to better characterize the inaccuracy.

I agree with Bryon 100%.

Regards,
-- Al

Almarg  (System | Threads | Answers | This Thread)


05-14-11   this sounded like helpful advice, so i did just that. from ...   Bryoncunningham

05-15-11   Lol, bryon - nice one, bringing out bierce!   Learsfool

05-15-11   Fwiw, mr t started out talking about 'neutrality' being an a ...   Newbee

05-15-11   Here is what i found from the site: merriamwebster.com/dict ...   Mrtennis

05-15-11   this issue is way above an english major's pay grade. it is ...   Bryoncunningham

05-15-11   Once again i am in complete agreement with bryon, despite th ...   Almarg

05-15-11   Bryon, your last post raises an issue i was not expecting. ...   Newbee

05-15-11   you missed it? that's strange to me. here's what i found... ...   Bryoncunningham

05-15-11   Bryon, fwiw, i've never considered the mere collection of co ...   Newbee

05-16-11   your repeated calls for someone to definitively answer the ...   Bryoncunningham

05-16-11   The latest part of this thread reminds me of one of my favor ...   Learsfool

05-27-11   Truth is truth is a good place to start. i will attempt to ...   Orpheus10

05-28-11   Orpheus10, i can only imagine trying to determine the " ...   Tbg

04-11-12   Well without being at the recording venue all is moot. the o ...   Pipedream

04-11-12   Pipedream is right. i will say that some recordings resembl ...   Mapman

04-11-12   Audio is an illusion. any truth, to whatever extent ascerta ...   Mapman

04-16-12   Mapman, i know all too well that your stance is just giving ...   Tbg

04-16-12   Tbg, i have not given up on anything. in fact, it took a ...   Mapman

04-17-12   Mapman, imho your last two posts are the soul of great wisdo ...   Newbee

04-18-12   Mapman, i had an experience last night that suggests we have ...   Tbg

04-18-12   Tbg, that's a recording i am not familiar with but has appe ...   Mapman

04-19-12   Mapman, it is sinatra and basie’s sinatra at the sands [vicy ...   Tbg

04-19-12   I have a carefully assembled system but also one that due to ...   Jult52

04-19-12   My dog seems to think a lot of what he hears me play is real ...   Mapman

04-19-12   Dog reaction is an amusing test of a system's realism. after ...   Bryoncunningham

04-19-12   brings to mind the most famous canine audiophile, nipper l ...   Almarg

05-17-12   "that led me to the following idea: if, after changing ...   Mapman

05-17-12   But we, or our brains are aware of harmonics and even notes ...   Tbg

05-17-12   "but we, or our brains are aware of harmonics and eve ...   Mapman

05-17-12   "for a split-second i thought someone was knocking on m ...   Kijanki

05-17-12   Sound effects of things that you are familiar with in real l ...   Mapman

10-31-12   I put out a recent post having not noticed this thread. in a ...   Lohanimal


< Prev 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8

  Post your response
Subject


Your response

No html, but you may use markup tags


Username
Members only

Password