AudiogoN
Search Buy Sell Learn MyPage
 Learn > Forums > Digital > 1161011915  Start New Thread | Log In | Bookmark This
  Review: Raysonic 128 CDP CD Player
My motivation for posting this is only because this is a new product on the market of which folks should be aware. It was recently reviewed by 6 moons if you're interested. I purchased it as a potential replacement for my CAL Alpha/Delta.

FWIW, I listen to Classical, Jazz, and pop vocal. No head banger stuff. Sonic preferences are for neutrality in all components - so long as they are 'tube based'. :-) While I can tolerate a bit of an uptilted bass so long as its undistorted, I can't tolerate exagerated high frequencies. I require transparency and smoothness. I can tolerate a bit of roll off so long as the signal is clean and clear.

I have had the Raysonic for about 3 weeks and it has just passed its breakin phase. Initially out of the box it was very rolled in the highs and full but dull in the bass. I'm still using the factory tubes (EH's). I did try different types and it is easy to change the units tone with different brands (whats new here!)

In comparison to my Wadia (direct to an amp) the Raysonic is as full but not as tight in the bass, as smooth in the mid range, and clearly not as extended in the highs. Compared to the Wadia thru a pre amp the gap closes quite a bit but the Wadia is still tighter and more extended.

In comparison to the BAT the bass is deeper and tighter but the mids and highs in the BAT are much more open and 'airy', perhaps a bit more transparent.

In comparison to the Cal units which it replaces it is sonically fuller in over-all tone, not as forward, and much smoother. I can't think of a single issue in which I prefer the Cal units, which have been long time favorites of mine in their price range.

And, in comparison to all three units, the Raysonic seems to have a greater dynamic range. I'm not talking speed, nor am I talking about absolute low or high frequency extension, I'm referring to the difference in the spread between the quietest and loudest sound.

I suspect this unit would have a high level of appeal not only to tubophiles, but to SS folks who want to avoid some of the more obnoxious effects of digital done wrong.

I'm keeping it!

Associated gear
Primaluna 3/5 pre-amp/amp
Tyler Linbrook Signature Systems Speakers

Similar products
Wadia 302
Bat DK5
CAL Alpha/Delta
Newbee  (System | Reviews | Threads | Answers | This Thread)

10-16-06
  Responses (1-12 of 12)
Click title to read one, or click date to read all below it.

10-19-06   Great review! good to here...what qualities and tube substit ...   Carusoracer

10-26-06   What tubes you should use will depend on your priorities and ...   Newbee

10-26-06   Thanks heaps for the review ! i have been keen on it reading ...   Jackthecat

12-19-06   Newbie, thanks for pointing me towads your review. i too and ...   Zar

12-19-06   Newbee - thanks for a very helpful and interesting review. d ...   Groberts3

12-20-06   Hi groberts3 wish i had an easy answer to your question - ...   Newbee

02-02-07   I asked a 6moons reviewer whether an nos machine would not b ...   13d3tube

02-02-07   Sorry, i meant classé is based in montreal and raysonic is b ...   13d3tube

02-20-07   I am now enjoying the raysonic 128 too and have tried a numb ...   Jackthecat

02-21-07   Jackthecat, if you want to hear an excellent tube in this un ...   Newbee

03-01-07   The raysonic is excellent player, although i listen to jazz, ...   Dwhitt

04-28-07   I know we are comparing tubes to all solid state (?apples to ...   rsasso@


  Post your response
Subject


Your response

No html, but you may use markup tags


Username
Members only

Password